Wellesley’s Railroad Stations

Step a few feet off the road leading from Town Hall to the post office and you’ll discover two long lost relics among the trees and weeds beside the railroad tracks:

Lamp post #1  (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014)

Lamp post #1
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014)

Lamp post #2 (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014)

Lamp post #2
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014)

Hmm….what are two rusty old lamp posts doing here??? To answer that question, take a look at the following photograph:

NYCStationWellesleyMA_cNov1958_DickLeonhardtFlickr_labeled

The old Wellesley station circa November 1958
(Posted with permission from Dick Leonhardt)

This makes me sad. It’s the old Wellesley station, which stood on the current site of the post office from 1889 until the structure was torn down — to the disbelief and outrage of many Wellesley residents — in 1962. All that was left standing were those two lamp posts, which you can sort of make out at the far end of the platform. (It might, however, be easier to compare them to identical ones on the right side of the image.)

The story about the construction of this stone station (and three others within Wellesley that closely resembled it) is rather complex. It wasn’t as if the Town just decided to build attractive railroad depots. In fact, outside forces — specifically the Boston & Albany Railroad Company — played the primary role in bringing them to Wellesley.

But before we delve into their construction, let me use this opportunity to provide a brief history of the railroad in Wellesley. After all, the first train came through town more than fifty years before these stone stations were constructed. It should also help you understand how the evolution of the town’s railroad stations mirrored Wellesley’s development into an affluent suburb.

The Arrival of the Railroad in Wellesley

The earliest form of steam-powered rail transportation arrived in the United States in the mid-1820s. Only several years later, in 1830, the first railroad line in the country — the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad — began service. Why the railroad became so popular so quickly is not difficult to understand. It was waaaay faster than traveling by stagecoach. But more importantly, especially to the American Industrialists, raw materials from the West and the South could now be shipped to the manufacturing centers in the Northeast much more efficiently than via canals and waterways.

One of the other early railroad lines was the Boston & Worcester Railroad, which opened from Boston to Newton in April 1834. Three months later, the track had been extended through Wellesley with stops established at Rice’s Crossing (Wellesley Farms), North Needham (Grantville/Wellesley Hills), and West Needham (Wellesley [Square]). It reached Worcester in mid-1835.

A separate line — the Western Railroad — stretching from Worcester to Greenbush, NY (outside of Albany) was constructed four years later, thus connecting Boston with the Hudson River and the West. In 1869, the Boston & Worcester Railroad Company consolidated with the Western Railroad to form the Boston & Albany Railroad Company.

So what was the immediate impact of the railroad on life in Wellesley? Probably not as much as you’d think. Remember, Wellesley was sparsely populated at that time and its village centers were almost non-existent. The vast majority of its residents lived on small farms scattered throughout the area. Most of the others worked in small factories, primarily in Lower Falls. With the exception of the occasional trip into Boston to buy supplies or a visit to relatives out West, life for these residents didn’t seem to change a whole lot.

But over the next three to four decades — especially in the years following the Civil War — Wellesley underwent a noticeable change as a result of the railroad. Although the town overall still very much stayed a small farming community, more and more businessmen and professionals from Boston were settling in Wellesley. Given its proximity of only twelve miles to the city, Wellesley was close enough for a quick commute by train into downtown Boston yet far enough out in the country to establish a serene estate. The impact of these men — who included Horatio Hollis Hunnewell, William T.G. Morton, Henry Fowle Durant, Josiah Gardner Abbott, and Gamaliel Bradford Sr. — would increase in the decades leading up to Wellesley’s incorporation in 1881 as they began to use their influence and wealth to shape the community as they saw fit.

The Railroad Stations of Wellesley (1834 – 1885)

The earliest record that I can find of any railroad station in Wellesley comes from a drawing of the West Needham (Wellesley) station dated 1847:

WestNeedhamStationAChartandDescriptionoftheBostonandWorcesterandWesternRailroadsWilliamGuild1847_lab

Note: Etherton Cottage, the summer residence of Dr. William T.G. Morton that was located on the current site of Town Hall, can be seen to the left of the station.
Source: Guild (1847)

It also appears that there was a depot at the North Needham (Grantville/Wellesley Hills) stop by 1852. But given its similarity in size and form to the West Needham station, I’m guessing that the North Needham depot was built in conjunction with the construction of the West Needham station.

North Needham/Grantville/Wellesley Hills station circa 1884 Source: Bradford (1928)

North Needham/Grantville/Wellesley Hills station circa 1884
Source: Bradford (1928)

Crazy fun fact: This North Needham station still exists. It was moved down Washington Street and converted into a duplex house to make way for the construction of the current Wellesley Hills station in 1885-86.

404 Washington Street

Former North Needham/Grantville/Wellesley Hills station (now 404 Washington Street)
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014)

Here’s the confusing part: there was a third station in Wellesley by 1852, but it wasn’t at Rice’s Crossing (Wellesley Farms) or even on the B&A mainline at all. It was actually in Lower Falls, just south of Washington Street more or less on the site of (the Italian restaurant) Papa Razzi. This stop wasn’t established until 1846 when a short spur that branched off the mainline at Riverside was constructed to serve Newton Lower Falls and Wellesley Lower Falls. It only had two stops: ‘Pine Grove’ (in Newton) and ‘Newton Lower Falls’ (in Wellesley). (There’s so much more to be said about the railroad in Lower Falls — which was in operation up through the early 1970s — but I’m going to save that for a separate post.)

The importance of these three stations to Wellesley life cannot be understated. They weren’t just places of shelter while waiting for a train. Rather each station often served as the post office and may even have had a small store within. But perhaps most significantly, they all served as some of the first social gathering spots within each village, as Gamaliel Bradford Jr. describes (in reference to the Grantville station during the 1850s and 1860s):

Before leaving the railroad station, which at that time, when there were no clubs, might regarded as the heart of the town, I must advert to one very piquant and characteristic figure, that of Mr. Charles Kingsbury…He was a great haunter of the station and loved to sit with a bevy of cronies and discuss all the affairs of the community, great and small. If their talk had been recorded by dictagraph, it would probably be astonishing and amusing, a sort of anticipation of the personal columns of The Townsman, less decorous and exact than the pages of that estimable sheet, but with a breeziness and spiciness which do not often get into print.

The North Needham (Grantville/Wellesley Hills) and Lower Falls wooden stations both survived until the 1880s when they were replaced by handsome stone depots (see below). The West Needham (Wellesley) stop also got its own stone depot at that time, but prior to that in the 1850s or 1860s, the old wooden station had been replaced with a larger and more elegant frame structure. The reasons for this are unclear, but my guess is that it probably had something to do with the fact that the village of West Needham (what is now Wellesley Square) was beginning to develop into a mini town center. An improved train station that fit with the growing affluence of the area was therefore necessary.

Another crazy fun fact:  This more elegant frame station was spared destruction when the stone depot replaced it in 1889. Instead of tearing it down, the building was moved across the tracks and a bit eastward where it became a freight house for the B&A. In 1958, that former station was sold to the president of Wellesley Refrigerator Sales and Service, Inc. (who had been leasing it for use as a warehouse for the previous four years). Today, the former depot is occupied by Captain Marden’s Seafoods.

CaptainMardens_21March2014_labeled

Former West Needham station (now 285 Linden Street)
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014)

As for the stop at Rice’s Crossing (Wellesley Farms), it doesn’t appear that there was any station there. Just what’s called a ‘flag stop’ — where those waiting for a train could take shelter until a railroad attendant could signal a passing train to stop. This flag stop was located on the other side of the Glen Road bridge from the current station at the rear of the property of Charles Rice.

There was also one other flag stop in Wellesley — at Lake Crossing on the mainline near the Wellesley-Natick border. Unfortunately, little is known about this stop. My guess is that it was established soon after Henry Wood opened his cement factory on Paintshop Pond after purchasing the mill site in 1847. Near to the end of the 19th Century, a wooden station was constructed at this stop. Its fate is unknown.

The Railroad Stations of Wellesley (1886 – present)

How and why four stone railroad stations were built in Wellesley between 1886 and 1894 is a small part of a much larger story that extends far beyond the town’s borders.

We’re actually going to begin this chapter in the early 1880s, a few years before the construction of the first stone depot in Wellesley. At the time, the Boston & Albany Railroad was as popular as ever; it was arguably the primary reason why towns to the west of Boston — specifically, Brookline, Newton, and Wellesley — were becoming full-fledged suburbs.

But there were several villages in Newton that weren’t on the mainline and wanted access to the railroad. The B&A thus decided to expand its commuter service, constructing the so-called Newton Circuit — a commuter branch off the mainline that allowed residents of Brookline and Newton living in such villages as Longwood, Chestnut Hill, Newton Centre, Newton Highlands, and Waban to take the train into Boston. (This circuit was closed in 1959 and converted to light rail transit. It is now the Green Line “D” Branch of the MBTA.)

Newton Circuit

Map showing the Newton Circuit
Source: Map of the Railroads of the State of Massachusetts (1898)

It was partly because of this increase in commuter traffic that the B&A adopted an ambitious station improvement plan along both the Newton Circuit and its mainline. The primary contributing factor, however, was a newfound appreciation for the role that railroad depots play within suburban communities, as urban planning pioneer Charles Mulford Robinson explains within his 1904 essay, Suburban Station Grounds:

To the commuter using a suburban railway the erection of pretty stations and the beautifying of their grounds is a matter of great concern. It means the extension of the home atmosphere quite to the railroad track. When he steps off the train he is at home, — as far as the soothing calm of a lovely scene can make him, — without having still a quarter mile of dreary trudging before there comes heart’s-ease.

Now contrast that ideal with the following description of the Wellesley station and grounds during the 1850s and 1860s (which hadn’t changed by the mid-1880s):

It was formerly remarked by strangers getting off at the station that the outlook “made one homesick.” The conditions warranted the criticisms. Almost anything served in those days for a country railroad station, and the one that did duty in this village in the ‘50’s and ‘60’s was a pretty common affair. It was flanked on the right, not as now by a fine bit of landscape, but by a row of coal sheds which stood in a sandy depression between the Aqueduct and the railroad tracks. This place has since been filled and graded and is now a part of Hunnewell Park. On the left of the station was an old building where the firewood was prepared and stood for the use of the locomotives. The wood was sawed by horse-power. A horse was hitched to a big draw-bar, driven round in a circle and a series of cog-wheels and pulleys transmitted the power to the saw. This method of cutting up wood furnished perennial amusement to the boys, who were delighted to get into the building on every opportunity and drive the horse while they rode on the draw-bar.

Not exactly the first impression that Wellesley’s forefathers dreamed of. You can therefore understand the excitement when the B&A decided to build new stations within the town.

In total, the Boston & Albany Railroad commissioned the construction of 32 stations in Massachusetts and New York between 1881 and 1894. That’s certainly impressive. But we probably wouldn’t be talking about them all that much if it weren’t for whom the B&A hired to design the stations and grounds: Henry Hobson Richardson and Frederick Law Olmsted.

Quite simply, Richardson and Olmsted were the leading professionals in their respective fields of architecture and landscape design. Even those who know absolutely squat about those subjects are familiar with their most famous works: Trinity Church in Copley Square and New York City’s Central Park.

Henry Hobson Richardson  (Source: )

Henry Hobson Richardson (1838 – 1886)
Source: The Cincinnati Astronomical Society (1914)

Frederick Law Olmsted  Source:

Frederick Law Olmsted (1822 – 1903)
Source: Olmsted & Ward (1912)

So how exactly did the B&A obtain the services of both H.H. Richardson and Frederick L. Olmsted? One word: connections. Richardson had been good friends with James Augustus Rumrill and Charles Sprague Sargent, both members of the Board of Trustees of the B&A, since the 1860s when all three had been classmates at Harvard. As for Olmsted, he had worked closely with Sargent to design the Arnold Arboretum in Brookline. (In addition, Richardson and Sargent — and later Olmsted — resided within the same Cottage Street neighborhood in Brookline.)

Of the 32 stations constructed by the B&A, however, only nine of them were designed by Richardson — a result of his untimely death in 1886 at the age of 47.

List of Boston & Albany Railroad depots designed by H.H. Richardson (with those still standing in bold):

  • Auburndale
  • Palmer
  • Chestnut Hill
  • South Framingham
  • Brighton
  • Waban
  • Woodland
  • Eliot
  • Wellesley Hills

Following Richardson’s death, the B&A commissioned the construction of 23 more stations to Shepley, Rutan and Coolidge, the architectural firm that was formed by three of Richardson’s former assistants: George Foster Shepley, Charles Hercules Rutan, and Charles Allerton Coolidge. These stations, not surprisingly, were virtually indistinguishable from the other nine, and are therefore often credited to Richardson.

List of Boston & Albany Railroad depots designed by Shepley, Rutan and Coolidge (with those still standing in bold):

  • Newton Highlands
  • Chatham, NY
  • Allston
  • Newton Lower Falls (located in Wellesley)
  • Ashland
  • Reservoir
  • Dalton
  • Springfield
  • Wellesley
  • Newton Centre
  • Huntington
  • Warren
  • Charlton
  • Brookline Hills
  • Hinsdale
  • Canaan, NY
  • Millbury
  • Riverside
  • Longwood
  • East Brookfield
  • Wellesley Farms
  • Saxonville
  • East Chatham

Does anyone else wonder how Wellesley got four stations and, say, Natick got zero? I’m not totally sure, but it probably had something to do with the influence of some of Wellesley’s elite citizens. For example, the Wellesley station — which was arguably one of the more elaborate designs in terms of both the station and the landscaping — may have been constructed as a favor for Horatio Hollis Hunnewell, a close friend and cousin of Charles Sargent. (Hunnewell was also an early financier of the railroad industry.)

It has also been suggested that the Wellesley Farms station was built at the request of Joseph Franklin Wight, a wealthy fur dealer who constructed his Carisbrooke estate (named for a castle on the Isle of Wight) in 1881 on the current site of Carisbrooke Road.

So without further ado, here are some photographs of Wellesley’s stone stations:

Wellesley Hills station — built 1885-86:

WHrailroadstation_ArchitecturalRecordVol36_1914_cropped_labeled

Source: Architectural Record (1914)

Source: Our Town (May 1902)

Source: Our Town (May 1902)

Source: Our Town (September 1903)

Source: Our Town (September 1903)

WellesleyHillsRailroadStation_front_21March2014_labeled

Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014

WellesleyHillsRailroadStation_back2_21March2014_labeled

Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in March 2014

Quick note: As you see in the images above, there used to extensive landscape surrounding the Wellesley Hills station and extending all the way down Washington Street to the Rockland Street bridge. These plantings (along with those between the station and the Cliff Road bridge) were removed in 1951-52 for the construction of the Wellesley Hills post office and the parking lot that is now west of the station.

Wellesley station (at Wellesley Square) — built 1889:

Source: Legenda (1903)

Source: Legenda (1903)

Source: Library of Congress

Source: HABS (1959)

Source: HABS (1959)

Source: HABS (1959)

Source: HABS (1959)

Source: HABS (1959)

Wellesley Farms station — built 1893-94:

Source: Robinson (1909)

Source: Robinson (1909)

Posted with permission from Dick Leonhardt

View of Wellesley Farms station from Hundreds Road (circa January 1957)
(Posted with permission from Dick Leonhardt)

FarmsRailroadStation_labeled

Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in May 2013

Confession: I don’t have a photo of the fourth station — the ‘Newton Lower Falls’ depot in Wellesley Lower Falls. I only know of one image that clearly shows the structure, but acquiring a digital copy from the library that possesses the image requires three weeks of notice and I didn’t give myself enough time. My bad. I’ll be sure to include it in my post on the railroad in Lower Falls.

I will say, however, that the station — built in 1887 and razed in 1944 — sat on the west side of the tracks about two hundred feet north of Washington Street at the current boundary between Waterstone at Wellesley (formerly Grossman’s) and the parking lot for Tony the Tailor and Wellesley House of Pizza (among other stores). I have no idea why they demolished the 57-year-old stone station, especially given that they built a frame one in its place.

We do, however, know why the Wellesley station was razed in 1962: i) the declining ridership and resulting financial struggles of the railroad and ii) the necessity for a new stand-alone post office in Wellesley Square.

Trouble for the Wellesley station began in 1959 when the New York Central Railroad (which then owned the B&A) filed a petition with the Commonwealth — which was ultimately approved — to eliminate all commuter service within Massachusetts and abandon its 39 stations. The increasing reliability on automobiles to commute to and from work, along with the newly constructed “D line,” was just too much for the financially struggling company.

That said, there were still nearly 1000 Wellesley residents who commuted to Boston each day via train. The Town of Wellesley therefore filed a joint appeal (along with Newton, Worcester, and Springfield) with the Massachusetts Supreme Court to fight the decision of the Commonwealth’s approval of the NYCR petition to close its commuter lines. Although the Town won in the sense that commuter service, although reduced, was never completely eliminated, it actually lost — in my opinion — because the Wellesley station was sold in 1961 and torn down the following year to make room for the construction of a building for the US Post Office, which had been housed in extremely tight quarters within the Taylor Block on the south side of Washington Street in Wellesley Square.

A newspaper rack is all that is left of the Wellesley station in July 1962 (Posted with permission from Wellesley Townsman)

A newspaper rack is all that is left of the Wellesley station in July 1962
(Posted with permission from the Wellesley Townsman)

That left standing in Wellesley just two of the four Richardson stations. In the years since, however, we nearly lost the station at Wellesley Farms multiple times. After the NYCR abandoned it and then a fire gutted its wooden interior, there were several calls for the Town to demolish it. Fortunately, none of these votes passed. In 1986, the station finally received proper recognition when it was listed on the National Register of Historic Places — a result of the hard work of Matthew Kierstead, an art history and architecture student who grew up in Wellesley and was saddened by the poor condition of the Farms station. It has since undergone a significant restoration.

The same cannot be said of the station at Wellesley Hills, which is in desperate need of a facelift (as seen in the photos above). Although its Washington Street side is in decent condition, the rear of the station is just depressing. A lot of the problem has to do with the placement of signs and receptacles that can easily be moved or modified. But the station itself needs help as well.

So how about, as a first step, we look into the possibility of listing the station on the National Register of Historic Places? After all, it is the only one of the four Richardson stations still standing not on the NRHP (individually or as part of a district). Even five of the eight stations credited to Shepley, Rutan and Coolidge are NRHP-listed.

Only by recognizing the history of this station, and thus honoring the legacy of the Boston & Albany Railroad, Henry Hobson Richardson, and Frederick Law Olmsted, do we stand a chance of preventing a repeat of what happened to the Wellesley station in 1962.

Sources:

  • A Chart and Description of the Boston and Worcester and Western Railroads by William Guild (1847)
  • Map of the City and Vicinity of Boston, Massachusetts by F.G. Sidney and R.P. Smith (1852)
  • Map of the Town of Needham, Norfolk County, Massachusetts by Henry Francis Walling (1856)
  • Atlas of Norfolk County, Massachusetts by W.A. Sherman (1876)
  • Boston Daily Globe: 10 January 1890
  • Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts by George W. Stadley & Co. (1897)
  • Map of the Railroads of the State of Massachusetts: Accompanying the Report of the Railroad Commissioners (1898)
  • Our Town: May 1902; September 1903
  • Wellesley Legenda (1903)
  • Suburban Station Grounds by Charles Mulford Robinson (1904)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 14 December 1906; 15 December 1944; 9 November 1950; 22 March 1951; 17 January 1952; 22 May 1958; 6 August 1959; 26 November 1959; 17 December 1959; 28 January 1960; 5 May 1960; 27 April 1961; 19 April 1962; 5 July 1962; 29 May 1969; 5 June 1969; 2 February 1984; 17 January 1985; 3 August 1986; 20 August 1987
  • Modern Civic Art by Charles Mulford Robinson (1909)
  • The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Vol. 64 (1910)
  • Genealogy of the Olmsted Family in America by Henry King Olmsted and Rev. George K. Ward (1912)
  • The Evolution of the Suburban Station by J.H. Phillips in Architectural Record, Vol. 36 (1914)
  • Richardson, the Architect and the Cincinnati Chamber of Commerce Building by The Cincinnati Astronomical Society (1914)
  • History of the Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts by Joseph E. Fiske (1917)
  • Early Days in Wellesley by Gamaliel Bradford (1928)
  • Boston & Albany Railroad Station (June 1959) by Cervin Robinson as part of the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS), accessible through Library of Congress
  • Architecture for the Boston & Albany Railroad: 1881 – 1894 by Jeffrey Karl Ochsner in the Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (1988)
  • Norfolk County Registry of Deeds
  • Wellesley Historical Commission files: #279-283R Linden Street; #404 Washington Street

A near-lynching in a piggery by a mob of Italians in 1884

“Stretched on a pallet of old mats in a corner of the dilapidated shanty known as McIntosh’s piggery lays the water contractor, C.H. Dacey. Standing guard over him, and seated around the shanty in little groups, are some fifty Italian laborers, who have constituted themselves his captors, and in spite of all civil authority are determined to hold him until their grievances have been adjusted.” — Boston Daily Globe, October 17th, 1884

This is definitely one of the most surreal episodes in Wellesley’s history. A large mob of Italian workers kidnapped their boss and held him captive inside an abandoned piggery because of unpaid wages. But what makes this story even more fascinating (at least to me) is that it’s inextricably linked to the introduction of indoor plumbing in Wellesley. So in a sense, I get to tell two stories in one.

(What’s that? You don’t care about how Wellesley got its running water? Well, boo hoo. This is a blog about Wellesley history. I did, however, keep that part of the post relatively short, so we’ll get to the mob scene soon enough.)

The story begins in May of 1883, almost a year and a half before the near-lynching. The Massachusetts Legislature had just passed a petition by the Town of Wellesley requesting permission to construct a town well and reservoir as well as to lay down the pipes required to deliver the water to its residents both for domestic use and for the fighting of fires. (Water was also needed to hose the dirt roads to keep the dust down during the summer.) Why the newly incorporated Town chose to do this so quickly after attaining its independence was entirely a result of its desire to leave behind its days as a relatively poor farming community. Indoor plumbing was an absolute necessity for any modern suburb.

Point of clarification: Many people seem to think that the Town could tap into the Cochituate and Sudbury Aqueducts, which were completed in 1848 and 1878, respectively. The water in those conduits, however, was reserved for the residents of the City of Boston.

The creation of a water supply system in Wellesley required three steps:

  • locate an adequate supply of potable water
  • construct a pumping station and a reservoir that could hold large quantities of pumped water
  • lay pipes underground that could channel the water (via gravity) from the reservoir to the households

Accomplishing the first task was easier said than done. It wasn’t as if the Town could just pump water straight out of the Charles River or Morses Pond. (I mean, it could…but would you want to drink that?) Instead hydrologists had to find a large enough aquifer with a high enough recharge rate and certain specific soil characteristics.

After three failed attempts to locate an adequate well along the Charles River — first in Lower Falls “just below the dams” (probably around River Street), then adjacent to Echo Bridge near Newton Upper Falls, and finally around River Ridge — success was found when they tested a site 400 feet east of Cedar Street near the current location of Barton Road. The water and soil properties proved ideal and so, beginning in April of 1884, they dug a permanent well, installed the pumping apparati, and constructed the station that provided protection and access to the equipment.

BartonRoadPumpingStation_12Feb2014_labeled

Pumping Station #1 on Barton Road
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in February 2014)

Now tell me, how many of you actually knew about this charming little building? After all, it’s completely out of sight from Cedar Street and the only way to access it is by driving down Barton Road. But it’s actually seen more frequently than you would think, if only because its roofline is unavoidable when you’re on Route 128 — especially driving northbound — between Exits 20 and 21.

Source: Bing Maps

Source: Bing Maps

Contrast that view with a map of the area from 1897:

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

With the exception of the highway and the addition of several houses, there don’t seem to be very many differences. But what this map doesn’t show is that almost all of the area between Cedar Street and the Charles River — which is now heavily forested — was nothing more than a large grassy field.

(One other key difference is the disappearance of the coal shed that once sat adjacent to the pumping station. Coal, of course, was needed to power the pump that brings water out of the ground and into the reservoir.)

Speaking of the reservoir — and I probably should have mentioned this earlier — it wasn’t as if they could construct it right next to the pumping station; rather, the reservoir needed to be located at a high enough elevation so that gravity could do all of the work in channeling the water to the households scattered throughout the town (in contrast to the pumping station which had to be closer to sea level where the watertable was higher).

There was really only one possible location for the reservoir given the distribution of households at the time: Maugus Hill. (Fun fact: Contrary to what many people think, this isn’t the highest point in Wellesley. That distinction goes to a spot just north of Monadnock Road — at 337 ft — which is the primary reason that the Peirce Hill Reservoir was constructed there in 1962 following the development of the Peirce Estates.)

So now that they had a site for the reservoir, all that remained was constructing it as well as laying the thirteen miles of cast-iron pipes connecting the pumping station to the reservoir and the reservoir to all of the households. (There are 149 miles of water pipes in Wellesley today.)

So here’s where the second part of this post comes in. (Finally!) Because this work was far more labor-intensive than simply installing a well and constructing a pumping station, the contractor for the job, Cornelius H. Dacey — the protagonist in our story — had to hire upwards of a hundred men to complete the project.

The details surrounding their employment are almost as fascinating as the mob scene itself. First off, a day’s pay for each of the men was a paltry $1.25 (for 11 hours of work), which amounts to the equivalent of only 30 bucks in 2014 dollars. But perhaps more interesting than that, the workers — almost all of whom were Italian immigrants from Boston’s North End — lived in Wellesley throughout the 2-3 months it took to complete the project, taking up quarters in an abandoned three-story piggery located at what is now the southeast corner of the Wellesley High School playing fields just north of the intersection of Rice and Paine Streets. (Neither road existed at the time, but there was a cart path that led from Washington Street to the piggery.)

At first, all seemed to go well. But problems arose in mid-October after Dacey had failed to pay the laborers for weeks of work — a total that amounted to $2000. Tempers soon began to rise. Sensing that this situation could get out of control, the Water Commissioners of the Town of Wellesley immediately arranged a meeting with Dacey at 5 Cliff Road, the home of one of the Commissioners, Albion R. Clapp.

Although the meeting went well — Dacey agreed to take the train to Boston, collect the $2000, and head back to Wellesley that evening to pay the workers — trouble began after he left Clapp’s house as he made his way over to the Wellesley Hills railroad station. Apparently, a few of the laborers were loitering at the station after hearing reports that their boss was back in town. Noticing them waiting, and realizing he couldn’t board the train at the Hills station without being seen, Dacey did his best to sneak out to Natick (by carriage) to board a Boston-bound train there. But unbeknownst to him, a few of the laborers had followed him as he tried to get away and had boarded the very same train.

Chaos would ensue once the train reached Wellesley Hills. Forcibly removing Dacey from his seat, the men who had followed him — along with the help of several other workers who had been waiting at the station — pulled him off the train and dragged him down Washington Street to the piggery. One of them then placed a noose around the contractor’s neck and threw the other end of the rope over the rafters. If Dacey couldn’t pay his workers, then they would lynch him.

Why such an extreme reaction, you ask? Well, according to one of the workers:

“We are poor men who want our money. Some of us have families who have nothing to eat. We are strangers here and the traders will not trust us. It is much better to use force than it is to starve. He is inside the barn now, all comfortable and warm, and our little ones are starving at home. It is no worse for him to suffer than for us. If he will settle he can go back, if he don’t we will keep him if we have to fight. If they come with police we will not let him go. We can die here.”

Yikes! Needless to say, the town’s residents were all on edge. A mob of Italian laborers — in broad daylight! — had just kidnapped their boss and were threatening to lynch him. Crowds of curious citizens began to form near the piggery. Even children from the Shaw School on Forest Street snagged a glimpse of the scene when they were let out after their morning session.

But, let’s face it, there really wasn’t much to see. Dacey was completely out of view within the piggery, as were most of his captors. Only a few of them stood outside to act as guards. Despite the presence of witnesses to this scene:

“Some rumors that there had been bloodshed and that several bodies were lying in front of the barn, from which their friends did not dare to rescue them, got in the wind, and many a good housewife laid down last night to dream of having her throat cut before dawn.”

Little did anyone know that help was actually on the way. Almost immediately after the kidnapping took place, Albion R. Clapp, had recognized the seriousness of what was happening and traveled to Boston along with one of the other Water Commissioners, Walter Hunnewell, to ask for help from the City’s Police Department. (At the time, the Wellesley Police Department consisted of no more than one or two officers.)

Unfortunately, it took nearly twelve hours before help could reach Wellesley. First, there was the matter of finding Boston Police Commissioner Jenks, who wasn’t at the station in Scollay Square or at his residence in the South End. (Fortunately, they found him on a return trip to Scollay Square.) And then they had to muster twenty members of the police force, supply each one with two revolvers and four pairs of handcuffs, and then charter two horse-drawn omnibuses from a local livery stable to take them on the 13-mile journey to Wellesley.

They wouldn’t reach Wellesley Hills until 4am, more than three hours after leaving the police station in Boston. (Some of that delay can be attributed to the fact that one of the horses “had a fit and died” at Newton Corner. I guess finding a replacement horse at that hour was a tad bit difficult.)

At this point in the story, why don’t I turn it over to a reporter from the Boston Daily Globe whose eyewitness account of what happened next may at times border on sensationalistic journalism, but at least it makes for a good read:

Among the first to get out was Dr. Jenks, who came forth smiling with a cigar in his mouth, and proceeded to assist Captain White in getting the men in line. “Pass out more handcuffs,” said the captain. “Pass them out; we want a pair for every Italian in the ranch.”

This was arranged to suit, and then he asked the men if they had their revolvers. He received an affirmative reply, and gave the order to forward march. The steady tread of the police made the streets of quiet old Wellesley echo as they marched down Washington street attended by crowds of citizens in front and rear. They followed on nearly half a mile, and stopped on reaching a little road that branched off to the left.

“File left, march,” said the captain, and the squad turned and went down a farm road full of ruts, escorted by the light of a single lantern.

“Now, boys,” said Captain White, “if a man so much as attempts to strike you I want you to hit him back. These men are hot-blooded, and must not have any rope, or there may be bloodshed.”

Saying this he gave orders for the men to cock their revolvers, and he and Lieutenant Kendall went up and took hold of the sliding door in the end of the barn, which yielded with difficulty to their strength. When the door slid away it revealed a queer sight. Around a fire on the ground near the entrance stood four or five sentinels warming their hands, for it was getting on toward daylight, and visitors were not expected. To the left, as far as the dim light could penetrate, was a row of closely-packed human bodies lying prone in a slumber. The police hastened inside in regular order. Awakened by the noise, each Italian rose to a sitting posture like a jack-in-a-box.

“Get down, get down.” “Down with you.” “Quiet there, will you?” “Stay right where you are, if you don’t want to get hurt,” cried a score of voices issuing from under their helmets. The police brandished their clubs, but did not use them.

The warlike Italians were completely cowed by the sight of so many men in uniform, and gave in trembling with terror. The lodging-house, which is an ex-barn, has three stories, the upper part of which is reached by a ladder on the inside in front. From the upper floors whole rows of glittering eyes looked down, shining in the lantern lights like diamonds set in jet. Taking the first one they came to, the officers proceeded to put on the steel wristers, using all alike. Soon a double row of dark laborers in their picturesque garbs of corduroy and velveteen was marched outside the door, guarded by cops on either side. Two dozen had thus been disposed of when Captain White discovered that his supply of hand-cuffs was giving out. The men aloft were ordered to dress and come down, while a man was sent to Mr. McIntosh’s for a rope. It came in a few minutes and the others were marched out in single file with the line made fast to their arms. The line was secured to the right arm of the first man and the left arm of the second and so on, giving them the appearance of smoked herring strung on a stick. It was growing daylight, and gray and brindle streaks were streaming up in the east when the last man was hitched in line. While those who were tied first were waiting for their companions to join them, they indulged in several tug-of-war games, and laughed and chatted in apparent good humor. An old man was taken down from the loft shivering from sickness. When the police found his condition he was allowed to return to bed. The boarding-master and several of his assistants were also allowed their freedom. All the rest, excepting those who jumped out the back windows in the early part of the row, were drawn up in line. Two of those who escaped came back and gave themselves up, swelling the number to sixty-eight. They and the police and the crowd formed a line nearly a quarter of a mile long. The line of march was then taken up for the Wellesley almshouse [the old clubhouse of the Wellesley Country Club], over a mile away. Nearly an hour was consumed on the journey [almost surely down Forest Street]. The road ran along by side of pleasant fields and orchards. Stately maples, radiant in their crimson autumn foliage, cast showers of leaves upon them as they passed, and the rustic residents turned out in full force. Wellesley never saw such a pageant before, and will probably never see such again.”

But the story isn’t over yet!

Once they reached the almshouse, the scores of Italian workers were taken up to the main hall on its second floor where they were untethered from the ropes and asked to empty the contents of their pockets into a large milk pan (yielding numerous stilettos and other “cruel-looking blades” in addition to tobacco, matches, and about two dollars in change).

They were then lined up and Dacey picked out the eight workers complicit in his abduction, allowing for the release of the other men. At this point, there was a bit of uncertainty about what to do with the alleged culprits. Should they stay locked up at the poor farm? Or should they hold an impromptu trail right then and there?

Why the latter, of course! So a judge from Dedham was brought in, evidence was presented, and witnesses were called to testify — including Dacey, Clapp, and “a pudgy little Irishman” who witnessed the initial assault on the train.

But the judge was unable to determine the guilt of the eight defendants without the aid of a grand jury. Alas, completion of the trial would have to wait until the next session of the Norfolk County Superior Court. So bail was set at $100 for each of the men — an amount that seems almost unfair given the fact that they hadn’t been paid in weeks. Thus unable to post bail, they were hauled off to the Dedham jail where their fate remains a mystery.

As for life in Wellesley, it’s safe to assume that things quickly went back to normal. In fact, it appears that work on the Town’s water supply system was barely interrupted. So by early 1885, residents of Wellesley were able to indulge themselves for the first time in the luxury of having indoor plumbing. And eventually other amenities began to arrive in the town: electricity, telephone service, and sewerage, to name a few. But with each of those, there were no mobs, no omnibuses filled with Boston police officers, and certainly no piggeries.

So who would want to read about that?

Sources:

  • Chapter 166 of the Massachusetts Legislature of 1883: An Act To Supply The Town Of Wellesley With Water
  • Boston Daily Globe: 17 October 1884; 18 October 1884; 19 October 1884; 24 October 1884
  • Wellesley Town Reports: 1884-1886
  • The Wellesley Water-Works by Frank L. Fuller in Journal of the Association of Engineering Societies, Vol. 3-4 (1885)
  • Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts by George W. Stadley & Co. (1897)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 24 May 1956; 9 August 1962
  • Wellesley Historical Commission files — Pumping Station #1
  • Massachusetts Water Resources Authority website
  • Town of Wellesley website

The Gates of Wellesley College

We’re all told not to judge a book by its cover. But who are we kidding? Everyone does it.

That’s why I don’t understand the main (vehicular) entrance to Wellesley College on Central Street. Imagine for a second that you’re a prospective or incoming student who’s visiting the campus for the first time. You have just spent months, perhaps years, dreaming of attending Wellesley. You’ve read numerous reviews of the College and even taped a poster of its Hogwartsian campus to your bedroom wall. The anticipation of arriving is almost unbearable. And then when you finally get here, this is what greets you:

Source: Google Maps

Source: Google Maps

Meh.

It’s certainly not ugly. (Nor is the other vehicular entrance on Washington Street.) But it’s completely unremarkable. And for $57,042 a year — the tuition and boarding costs for the 2013-14 academic year — I’d expect a grand entrance. If not a gothic archway, then how about a set of wrought iron gates? This is, after all, one of the Seven Sisters, not Podunk University.

The irony is that, prior to 1961 — when the tuition was much cheaper — the vehicular entrances to the Wellesley College campus were actually quite impressive. Perhaps some of you even remember the last of these: the set of stone gates at the intersection of Central Street and Weston Road. Although you can’t drive through them today, they served as the primary entrance to the campus for nearly four decades. But these weren’t the first set of gates. In fact, the College was almost fifty years old by the time they were constructed.

Source: Google Maps

Source: Google Maps

In order to explain the (surprisingly complex) history of the gates of Wellesley College, let’s start out with one of the earliest maps of the campus, dating from right around the school’s inception in 1875.

Before we worry about the four different entrances, let’s begin by taking a broader look at the campus. First you’ll notice that it’s bounded (as it is today) by the “highway to Natick” (Central Street) along the bottom of the image parallel to the railroad tracks and the “highway to South Natick” (Washington Street) in the upper left corner. You can also see the road “to Weston” (Weston Road) at the bottom left corner.

Now that your bearings are straight, let’s take a look at the campus itself. Unfortunately, there’s not a whole lot that you’re going to recognize because most of the buildings and roads on the map no longer exist.

First and foremost, there’s College Hall, which is located prominently in the center of the map at the northern edge of Lake Waban.

CollegeHall_bySeaver_cropped_labeled

College Hall (photograph taken by Seaver)
Source: Wellesley College Digital Archives

Without a doubt, the most awe-inspiring and breathtaking building ever constructed within the Town of Wellesley, College Hall was Wellesley College for the institution’s first thirty-nine years. One therefore can say quite a bit about the five-story structure. But since this story is more focused on the history of the campus gates, I’ll just refer you to my post on College Hall and move on to the other buildings on the College grounds.

So let’s now zoom in on the upper left corner of the map:

Given the topic of this post, it might make sense to start with the ‘Principal Entrance’ and the tiny structure to its left. But let’s hold off on that for the time being and focus first on the other buildings. We also need to travel further back in time long before the College was established.

The story actually begins in 1854 when Henry Fowle Durant — the founder of Wellesley College — began spending his summers in what is now Wellesley. He had just got married that spring and, having obtained great wealth through his law practice in Boston, sought to build a summer estate out in the country. (The reason he chose Wellesley is unclear, but I suspect that it had something to do with the fact that the both he and his wife, Pauline Adeline Fowle, were cousins of Horatio Hollis Hunnewell and his wife, Isabella Pratt Welles, who had already developed their own estate at the edge of Lake Waban.)

The Durants, however, held off building their dream house on their 75-acre estate and instead resided at the ‘Farm House’ (as seen on the map above).

DurantHomestead_Legenda1925_labeled

The ‘Farm House’ (now known as Homestead) 
Source: 1925 Wellesley Legenda

Over the next decade, the Durants developed the southern portion of their estate into a modest little farm, constructing a series of cow barns and greenhouses (conservatories) to the rear of the ‘Farm House.’ The plan then was to build a large manor — similar to that of the Hunnewells — far back from Washington Street on the current site of Stone and Davis Halls. But it never came to be. In 1863, their seven-year-old son, Harry, died after a short illness, leaving the Durants — in particular, Henry — too distraught to care about constructing their own mansion. (Their only other child, Pauline, had died in infancy six years earlier.)

Durant decided instead to use his money to establish an institution for the education of young women. That leads us back to the map. Given that the entire College was to consist of a single building — College Hall — and that this building was so large that it could only fit on the hill overlooking the north shore of Lake Waban, the only question was where to place the gates to the campus.

In total, there were four different entrances when the school opened in 1875. The most significant of these was (not surprisingly) the ‘Principal Entrance’ on Washington Street a little bit east of the ‘Farm House.’ This gate was, after all, the first site of the College seen by incoming students and visitors. Remember, this was loooong before the days of the Internet and giant glossy college brochures. Thus, there was an opportunity to make a strong first impression.

And so Henry Durant commissioned Hammatt Billings (the same architect of College Hall) to design a set of gateposts along with a charming little gatehouse — known as East Lodge — at the Principal Entrance. In fact, it’s believed that East Lodge was completed in either 1869 or 1870 before construction on College Hall even began, so as to give passersby the perception that the arrival of the College was well on its way.

EastLodge_HistoryofNorfolkCounty_DHamiltonHurd_1884_archiveorg_cropped_labeled

East Lodge
Source: Hurd (1884)

EastLodge_LOCcirca1908_cropped_labeled

East Lodge circa 1908 (photograph taken by Detroit Publishing Co.)
Source: Library of Congress

Other than East Lodge, there were three other entrances to the campus: one by the ‘Farm House’ that followed an old cow path that led from Washington Street to the barns, another on Central Street somewhat west of Weston Road, and a third at the far western edge of the original campus on Central Street. But only the last of those had a gatehouse. This tiny structure — known as West Lodge — was also designed by Hammatt Billings and constructed around 1870. The job of its attendant, however, wasn’t to greet visitors. Rather it was to check in the materials and supplies offloaded from railway cars directly across Central Street — including seven million bricks — that were needed for the construction of College Hall.

It appears, however, that this entrance closed soon after the construction of College Hall was completed in 1875. This is evident on a map of Wellesley College from 1897. (Click map to enlarge.) You can see that West Lodge sits all alone in the northwest corner with no connection to the rest of the campus.

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

There are also two more differences of which to take note. First, a third gatehouse — North Lodge — now appears at the other Central Street entrance to the campus. Although this road had been used by drivers delivering coal to College Hall since 1875, a gatehouse hadn’t been necessary until 1896 when the Natick & Cochituate Street Railway Company installed the first trolley line through Wellesley. Worried that unwelcome visitors from the surrounding cities and towns would now trespass on the campus grounds, College officials constructed North Lodge to provide protection against intruders.

The other difference between the 1875 and 1897 maps is the addition of the entrance to the campus at the intersection of Central Street and Weston Road. Established soon after 1892, when the first Hunnewell Grammar School was moved onto the College grounds from its original location on Cross Street and converted into the Fiske Cottage dormitory (through a generous donation from the widow of Boston banker, Joseph Norton Fiske), this entrance quickly became popular with members of the College community. It wasn’t until the early 1920s, however, that the stone gates that now flank this entrance — a gift from the Class of 1916 — were constructed.

Class of 1916 Gates Source: Wellesley College Digital Archives

Class of 1916 Gates
Source: Wellesley College Digital Archives

The roads and gates of the campus would begin to take their modern configuration over the next four decades. The first significant change occurred in the early 1930s, when East Lodge was closed to vehicular traffic and North Lodge was razed to accommodate the construction of Munger Hall.

But the more drastic modification to the College grounds occurred during the summer of 1961. After years of studying ways to the make the campus more pedestrian friendly, the Administration decided to close the Class of 1916 gates to vehicular traffic and reconfigure the roadways that ran through the campus. There were just far too many cars and trucks speeding around and putting the College community at risk. By rerouting the main road and closing off and grassing over long sections of roadways, they were able to create a campus that was both far less dangerous to pedestrians as well as more aesthetically pleasing.

The closing of the Class of 1916 gates was also undertaken in order to improve the intersection at Central Street and Weston Road. Ever since the advent of the automobile, serious accidents were extremely common at this location. But one that occurred in July of 1959 proved to be the tipping point. A pickup truck carrying eight teenagers from Wellesley — five of them riding in the bed of the truck — was traveling far too fast when it turned into the campus as the group headed from Howard Johnson’s on Central Street to Lake Waban for a midnight swim. The truck skidded, throwing those in back into the gates. Two 17-year-old boys — one a recent graduate of Wellesley High and the other a rising senior — died in the crash.

Since then, over a half century later, the Wellesley College campus has had a much improved record when it comes to pedestrian (and driver) safety. Although the main campus road is often used as a shortcut by motorists to get between Washington and Central Streets, the dangers caused by this practice aren’t remotely comparable to how it once was.

Given that success, it might seem petty to complain that the main entrances to the campus are underwhelming in their appearance. But I can’t help but feel that they are critical components of the campus especially given the attention that the College once gave to its various gates and lodges. So let me throw out the idea that Wellesley College — in conjunction with its efforts to improve the campus in anticipation of its Sesquicentennial in 2025 — consider constructing some sort of a handsome gate at each of the main entrances that harmonizes with the rest of the campus. Perhaps a graduating class can get involved just like the Class of 1916 nearly a century ago.

Isn’t it about time Wellesley College got the breathtaking entrances it truly deserves?

Sources:

  • Wellesley College Digital Archives
  • History of Norfolk County, Massachusetts by D. Hamilton Hurd (1884)
  • Reminiscence of the Family of Captain John Fowle of Watertown, Massachusetts (1891)
  • Professional and Industrial History of Suffolk County, Massachusetts by William Thomas Davis (1894)
  • Reports of the President: 1896, 1916-18; 1919-21; 1931-32; 1933-34; 1958-59; 1959-60; 1960-64
  • Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts by George W. Stadley & Co. (1897)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 13 May 1921; 23 July 1959; 11 May 1961; 7 September 1961;
  • Wellesley Legenda1925
  • Wellesley College, 1875-1875: A Century of Women edited by Jean Glasscock (1975)
  • Wellesley College website (accessed January 2014)
  • Library of Congress
  • Google Maps

Special thanks to the Wellesley College Digital Archives for granting me permission to post images from its collection.

Addendum:

I failed to mention above that both East and West Lodges still stand today. They are, however, quite hidden from view, perhaps so that the residents of each lodge — members of the College faculty — are afforded at least a smidgen of privacy. So if you decide to snoop around, please be respectful.

East Lodge Source: Google Maps

East Lodge
Source: Google Maps

West Lodge (Source: Google Maps)

West Lodge
Source: Google Maps

North School (Warren Elementary School)

Message from Josh: This blog turned one year old last week. I’d just like to give a heartfelt thanks to all of you for reading my posts and sharing them with your friends and family. Please continue to spread the word. The only way we’re going to help improve the state of preservation in Wellesley is through increased awareness of the town’s historical treasures.

Fun fact: At its peak, there were twelve elementary schools in Wellesley — five more than there are today.

Some of you probably already knew that. But did you know that the site of only one of those elementary schools — Warren — had been the location of a school for nearly 200 years? Think about that for a second. Up until Warren closed in 1987, children had passed through the doors of that schoolhouse — or one of its five predecessors — each year since the second term of the administration of George Washington!

Aerial View of Warren School  Source: Bing Maps

Aerial view of Warren School
Source: Bing Maps

So where was the school in that end of town located before the first schoolhouse was constructed on this site? How about nowhere! This was, after all, prior to the establishment of school districts within the Town of Needham. The only “schools” were nothing more than houses where paid citizens taught children how to read and write. The importance of the site of Warren School — that triangular parcel of land at the intersection of Washington and Walnut Streets — therefore cannot be overstated. It literally marks the birthplace of the Wellesley Public Schools. The fact that these specific school grounds were also the site where our public educational system developed over the next two centuries makes it that much more special.

(To be precise, there is record of the sporadic use during the 1700s of very primitive schoolhouses on Church Street and at the eastern end of Linden Street, as well as one that was carted around town to the different population clusters. Click here to read more about the early history of public education in Wellesley.)

The first schoolhouse on the site of Warren School wasn’t built until around 1796, eleven years after Needham officials voted to divide the town into school districts. Of course, this school wasn’t known as Warren — which was only used for the 1935 schoolhouse. Instead, it was referred to either as the North District Schoolhouse (or simply, North). In fact, the first five schoolhouses all used that moniker.

But why North instead of East? Wasn’t the school located at the eastern edge of Wellesley? Remember, however, that Wellesley was still a part of Needham at the time. And if you look at a map of what was then Needham, the region the school served — encompassing all of what is now Wellesley Hills, Wellesley Farms, and Lower Falls — was the geographical northern section of the town.

Let me now clear up your mental image of this schoolhouse…because it was nothing like what you or I consider to be an adequate facility for the education of our youth. Based on the few descriptions of the structure that exist, it was pretty much a large unpainted shack with a window here and there to let in some light. And inside, there was little more than several benches and the ever-important box stove that kept the children warm (enough) during the winter.

This is totally understandable, however, because we’re talking about public education in a poor farming town at the turn of the 19th Century! “School” still consisted of nothing more than getting all of the young children into a single room and teaching them the basics of reading, writing, and grammar. Once they learned that, it was back into the fields.

But it’s also undeniable that North got the short end of the funding stick compared to the other district schools. That’s because, unlike today — when the budgets of each of our elementary schools are comparable, resulting in parity between the schools — up until the late 1800s, the budgets of the district schools were determined entirely by the Town Assessor. The more taxes collected in the district, the larger the budget of the district school. In other words, if you resided in a poorer or underdeveloped part of town, you were stuck with an inferior school.

This was especially true for the North district. In 1805, for example, its annual budget was $94.79 compared to $122.90 for the West district — the other school district in what is now Wellesley. The wealthiest district, for what it’s worth, was the Great Plain district at $155.36. (Yes, there was a time when Needham was richer than Wellesley…)

Over the next three decades, however, the North district grew rapidly in terms of both population and wealth, due mostly to the growth of the paper manufacturing industry in Lower Falls. By 1836, North had the largest annual budget of all the district schools in Needham.

This increase in population and wealth — along with a vote from the Town to “equalize” all of the different district schoolhouses — led to a new North District School building in 1833. Unfortunately, just as with its predecessor, we don’t have that many details about this second schoolhouse. Nor do we have much information about the third or fourth North Schools, built in 1842 and 1858, respectively. It’s fair to say, however, that each school was larger and more modern than the preceding one. And how do we know this? Well, it helps that the second and fourth buildings still exist.

31Columbia_27Dec2013_labeled

Second North District Schoolhouse (Built 1833) — Now 31-33 Columbia Street
Sold in 1842 to General Charles Rice, who moved it to the rear of his estate on
Washington Street in Lower Falls and converted the structure into a two-family dwelling.

56WashingtonStreet_27Dec2013_labeled

Fourth North District Schoolhouse (Built 1858) — Now 56 Washington Street
Sold in 1874 to William C. Heckle, who moved it to the corner of Washington
and Crescent Streets and converted the structure into a single-family residence.

(The first and third schools were also sold and moved at the time of the construction of their successors. The c.1796 schoolhouse was relocated across the street near the current site of 135 Washington Street, but later was razed or burned down. The 1842 schoolhouse was sold to someone named Jennings, but where it was moved to is unknown.)

We also don’t know much about what went on inside of these schoolhouses. To my knowledge, there just aren’t any documents that record the day-to-day activities of the schoolchildren. So we’re left wondering what it was like attending school in Wellesley up through the mid-1800s.

The best we can do is piece together some facts here and there, most of them coming from the Needham Town Reports. Consider, for example, a breakdown of the North District School budget for the year 1851:

  • Sarah B. Kingsbury: teaching 16 weeks ($80)
  • William Pierce: wood ($21.51)
  • Ebenezer Smith: sawing and splitting wood ($6.62)
  • William L. Clark: cleaning house, pail, broom, etc. ($7.60)
  • Z.R. Tappan: teaching 18 weeks ($72)
  • G.E. Clark: teaching 17 ½ weeks ($175) and building fires ($5)

This is pretty typical of each annual budget. The vast majority of the money went to pay the teachers while the rest went to cleaning the schoolhouse and procuring/preparing firewood (or coal after the construction of the 1858 schoolhouse). But what about teaching supplies? Ha ha. Very funny. This was loooong before projects and activities became commonplace in the classroom. Classes pretty much consisted of only repetitive exercises and recitations. All a student needed was some ink or chalk — which was either supplied by the teachers or donated by local citizens.

It also helped if the children had schoolbooks. Obtaining these, however, posed many problems because, unlike today, it was the responsibility of the parents to purchase schoolbooks for their sons and daughters. Unfortunately, few parents cared enough about the education of their children to buy the recommended books. The result was that many students had to share books or teachers needed to create individual lessons for each and every student based on what books were available. The teachers therefore were very thankful when, every so often, local citizens would donate a set of schoolbooks to the class.

It’s also difficult to determine the school calendar with any precision. But we do know that there were two 16 to 18 week terms in the summer and winter — presumably, children had to help out on the farm or in the house during the spring and fall. Not surprisingly though, attendance during the winter was almost entirely dependent on the weather. If you lived a few miles away from school or far off the main roads — which were the only ones plowed — it really wasn’t very safe to try to walk to school. In fact, a significant number of students weren’t even enrolled in school at all because the school was too far away. This was one of the main reasons that, in 1854, a new district school was established in Grantville (Wellesley Hills).

(One can’t stress enough the importance of the creation of an additional school district. It wasn’t as if parents could homeschool their children before shipping them off to junior high. If you didn’t attend the district school, you didn’t receive any schooling. The only other level of education available in town during the 19th Century — high school — wasn’t established until 1865. But that was reserved for only the brightest of the older students at each district school.)

A huge turning point in the history of North School came in 1874 with the construction of the fifth schoolhouse. Although the town was still far from becoming a modern and affluent suburb, its officials realized that the only way to develop was to invest heavily in its schools and their facilities.

Fifth North District Schoolhouse (Built 1874)

Fifth North District Schoolhouse (Built 1874)
(Posted with permission from the Wellesley Townsman)

Designed by Peabody & Stearns, one of the most notable architectural firms in the Northeastern United States during the late 19th and early 20th Centuries — its architects also designed the Custom House Tower in Boston and many of the mansions in Newport, Rhode Island — the 1874 North Schoolhouse was an incredible improvement over its predecessor. It was also among the most architecturally unique buildings ever constructed in Wellesley. But that’s probably obvious from the photograph above, which was taken prior to 1897 when the right half of the school was literally raised upwards so that more classrooms could be constructed below — which is a real shame because it took away much of the character of the original building.

Fifth North District Schoolhouse Source: Wellesley Town Report (1930)

Fifth North District Schoolhouse circa 1930
Source: Wellesley Town Report (1930)

A few other interesting tidbits from the pre-1897 photo of the North School:

  • Notice that fence separating the school grounds from the road? It’s said that the fence wasn’t put up to keep schoolchildren from running into the road — after all, the only “traffic” back then was the occasional carriage or horseback rider. But rather the fence was there to keep the cows that were used to trim the grass within the school grounds.
  • Also take note of the well in the foreground (and what looks to be a person standing next to it). This makes me think that the photograph was taken much earlier than 1897, as indoor plumbing in Wellesley — at least the water supply part — dates back to 1884. Although it’s true that many open wells survived long into the 20th Century, Washington Street — the road seen in that photo — was one of the first to have underground pipes.
  • Based on the presence of the road in the photo, you’re probably confused now about the orientation of North School. See, unlike Warren, the 1874 schoolhouse fronted on Washington Street. It was also located on the western end of the school grounds closer to the intersection of Washington and Walnut Streets — as were all four of the previous school buildings. But that’s because there really wasn’t anywhere else to put them as the school grounds only extended as far east as the edge of the hill that slopes down towards the current site of the playground.
Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

I hope this map doesn’t further confuse you. It’s a bit disorienting because there’s a tiny (now extinct) street just to the east of the North schoolhouse. This road — which was actually the vestige of Washington Street before the main road was straightened many years earlier — used to separate the original school grounds from the current site of Warren, but was wiped off the map in 1930 when the Town was able to acquire the latter tract of land (which was used for a long time as a dumping ground for trash and other refuse). The children needed a playground and what better place to let boys and girls play than on an old dump?

The existence of this playground, however, was short-lived. By that point in time — actually as early as the late 1910s — the old North schoolhouse had become woefully inadequate. It was way too small — 40 to 50 students in a single classroom was not uncommon! — but perhaps more importantly, its wooden exterior and frame structure was a definite fire hazard.

Crowded first grade classroom in Fifth North District Schoolhouse  Source: Wellesley Town Report (1930)

Crowded first grade classroom in Fifth North District Schoolhouse
Source: Wellesley Town Report (1930)

However, a new schoolhouse was years away. The Town was far too preoccupied constructing five new elementary schools — Hardy, Kingsbury, Sprague, Brown, and Perrin — a result of the near doubling of the town’s population during the 1920s as Wellesley evolved into a commuter’s suburb. The old wooden schools — North, Hunnewell, and Fiske — would just have to wait.

The other complicating factor in building a new North School was that once its turn came, the discussion regarding funding the project coincided with the debate over whether to renovate or rebuild the High School (then located on Kingsbury Street on the current site of the Middle School). You have to remember that this was smack in the middle of the Great Depression, and although Wellesley was relatively insulated from the economic downturn that devastated the country, there were several fervent anti-tax groups during the 1930s that did what they could to reduce Town spending.

In 1933, after upwards of four years of debate, the townspeople were finally able to agree to a plan where the Town would apply for a 30% subsidy from the Federal Emergency Relief Fund for the construction of a new North School and the renovation of the High School.

(Although the Federal Government approved the request, the bids received for the renovation of the High School came in over budget, resulting in the renewed debate over whether a new high school was a better option. It wasn’t until 1937 that construction began on a new high school at the rear of Hunnewell Field. In spite of all this, the Town managed to build a new North School two years earlier.)

The new North School was, of course, what you and I know as the Annie F. Warren Elementary School.

Annie F. Warren Elementary School  (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in December 2013)

Annie F. Warren Elementary School
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in December 2013)

Designed by Benjamin Proctor Jr. — a Wellesley resident and the architect of the Isaac Sprague Memorial Tower and the Community Playhouse, as well as numerous other buildings throughout the town — the new schoolhouse and its neo-Georgian architecture was a significant departure from that of the 1874 North School.

Although there’s little about the new school to find fault with — it certainly was an impressive building — I have to express disappointment that they didn’t carry on the North name. It had, after all, been a part of the town’s history for 139 years and connected this part of Wellesley back to the days when it was a community of farmers and mill workers in the north section of Needham.

But at least they renamed the new building after a well-deserving figure: Annie Frances Warren. A teacher (and principal) at North from 1885 to 1910 — and an instructor of English and mathematics at Phillips Junior High for ten years after that — “Nanna” Warren (1860 – 1923) helped guide North through such changes as the implementation of grading and the school’s transition from a district school (with grades 1-9) to a regular elementary school. Few educators in Wellesley history have had a more lasting impact on the town’s youth.

I also take solace in knowing that the Warren family name has now been forever immortalized. The Warrens used to be a really big deal in Lower Falls, most notably because of Annie Warren’s father, Daniel. Born in Ireland and arriving in the United States in 1852 with only one dollar and twelve cents in his pocket, Daniel Warren managed to establish a lucrative express business in Lower Falls, delivering coal, hay, and grain throughout Wellesley and the surrounding communities. He also participated heavily in Town government — something that was relatively uncommon for an Irishman — and was even the first Irish-born resident in either Needham or Wellesley to sit on a jury. In 1910, however, Warren’s Express — which had been carried on by two of his sons — was acquired by another delivery business and the Warren name began to fade into obscurity.

But Warren Elementary School kept it alive. And even today — despite the fact that the school closed in January of 1987 following the renovation and reopening of Schofield — everyone knows of the name Warren…if only because of its insanely popular playground or that the former schoolhouse is now the headquarters for the Town’s Recreation and Health Departments (after serving as studio space for local artists through the 1990s).

I’m also pleased that they’ve kept Warren looking pretty much the same (at least from the front) as it did when it first opened in 1935. Unfortunately, the interior of the school has been almost entirely modified in some way or another — most notably with the addition of a new (albeit very functional) gymnasium. The only piece of the original school that still seems to rest intact is the dedication tablet inside the main door.

Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in December 2013

(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in December 2013)

But I can’t really complain all that much. There are still few places in Wellesley that are as aesthetically pleasing yet so historically significant as the Warren school grounds.

 Sources:

  • Needham & Wellesley Town Reports
  • Map of Needham, Massachusetts by Henry Francis Walling (1856)
  • Boston University Year Book (1882)
  • Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts by George W. Stadley & Co. (1897)
  • Biographical Review, Volume 25 – Containing Life Sketches of Leading Citizens of Norfolk County, Massachusetts (1898)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 22 July 1910; 12 September 1919; 26 January 1923; 8 March 1929; 21 March 1930; 11 April 1930; 1 August 1930; 17 November 1933; 1 December 1933; 12 January 1934; 20 April 1934; 20 August 1934; 19 October 1934; 9 November 1934; 1 February 1935; 25 October 1935; 5 December 1935; 6 October 1937; 24 May 1956; 15 January 1987
  • History of Needham, Massachusetts: 1711-1911 by George Kuhn Clarke (1912)
  • History of the Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts by Joseph E. Fiske (1917)
  • The Harvard Graduates’ Magazine, Volume 26 (1917)
  • St. Mary’s Cemetery in Needham, Massachusetts

All uncredited photographs were taken by Joshua Dorin.

The Convalescent Home

convalescent: /,känvə-’lesənt/ a person who is recovering after an illness or operation

This isn’t a word we use all that often. Maybe that’s because modern medicine has shortened the recovery period for many of the most common ailments. Serious diseases can now be treated with relative ease. But it wasn’t all that long ago when those recovering from stubborn illnesses or even minor surgical procedures would require weeks, if not months, of bedrest within hospital wards. And then there were diseases that doctors were unable to cure. The only prescription — if you even want to call it that — was lots of fresh air, sunshine, and rest.

Which is where Wellesley comes in. For years — beginning as early as the mid-19th Century — Wellesley was a popular destination for wealthy Boston residents who were struggling to recover from lingering illnesses. A few weeks in the country, far removed from the smoke-filled air and sewage-tainted water, might help improve their health.

The same reasoning explains why Boston Children’s Hospital chose Wellesley in which to establish a facility where its young patients could recover from crippling diseases. In fact, over 25,000 children from all over the region — but specifically Boston — spent anywhere from a few weeks to upwards of twelve months at the convalescent home here between 1875 and 1959.

Before I delve into the history of the Convalescent Home in Wellesley — which was located for most of those years at the eastern edge of the current Babson College campus — something needs to be said about the origins of Children’s Hospital. After all, it wasn’t like the Convalescent Home was a stand-alone institution where sick children who were deemed incurable were sent to live. Rather, it was a crucial component of the hospital — one could think of it as an extension of the hospital’s wards — that was part of the treatment for many young patients.

The establishment of Boston Children’s Hospital actually only predates that of the Convalescent Home by several years. But the idea of a hospital devoted to the care of children goes back decades earlier. For years, the city’s civic leaders and physicians toiled with trying to find a way to combat the crippling diseases and high mortality rates of the young. In particular, the children of the poor were in desperate need of care:

“Confined, as they often are, in close courts, narrow alleys, damp cellars, or filthy apartments, which the sunshine never cheers, nor the fresh air purifies; lying on uncomfortable and untidy beds, scantily covered from the cold; insufficiently fed with innutritious and unwholesome food, and tended by rough and careless hands, they become an easy prey to sickness in its worst forms, and sometimes waste away and die without even the alleviation of soothing words.” — Annual Report of The Children’s Hospital (1869)

But it wasn’t only poor children who needed assistance. Sons and daughters of wealthier families could also benefit from a medical facility devoted to treating the young:

“Even among the poor of a better class, — whose small rooms are neat and cleanly, whose hearts are warm with natural affection, and who reluct at no self-denials for their sick or wounded children, — the hard and incessant toil, that is necessary to keep their families from absolute pauperism, prevents the possibility of devoting to the little sufferers the time and care which they require. Painful as the deprivation is to the mother or sister, they cannot leave their work to give the needed medicine, or apply the proper dressing, at the right time; nor can they watch all night after the exhausting labors of the day.” — Annual Report of The Children’s Hospital (1869)

So when Boston Children’s Hospital first opened its doors in 1869, there was great hope that it could alleviate much of the suffering that had long-plagued so many families throughout the region.

And that it did. But it wasn’t like patients were cured of their ills the moment they were admitted. There was still a long road to recovery. Many children even died despite the best efforts of the doctors and nurses — which was part of the reason that the Convalescent Home was established in the first place. Perhaps a few weeks in the country would give those children a greater chance of overcoming their illnesses. (In addition, the demand for treatment at the hospital was far greater than the number of beds available. By sending those children who would otherwise be spending weeks to months in the hospital’s wards to the Convalescent Home, it was able to treat many, many more patients.)

The first Convalescent Home actually was located in Weston and was nothing more than a small house capable of holding up to six patients at a time. It had been outfitted with the necessary supplies, as well as toys and decorations to keep the children entertained, and was staffed by a nurse and one of the members of the Ladies’ Aid Association (a group of women, many of whom were the wives of the directors of the hospital) whose responsibilities included managing all aspects of the Convalescent Home.

By the end of the summer of 1874, a total of 19 children (each spending an average of three weeks and showing significant improvements in their health) had been treated at the Home.

The following summer — actually from late spring until mid-autumn — the Convalescent Home opened once again, this time, however, at 12 Wellesley Avenue near Wellesley Square in a farmhouse large enough to provide care for up to a dozen patients at a time.

The former location of the Convalescent Home at 12 Wellesley Avenue (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in November 2013)

12 Wellesley Avenue — the former location of the Convalescent Home
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in November 2013)

Now some of you might be wondering why on Earth they wouldn’t locate the Convalescent Home in the outskirts of town. Remember, however, that back in the late 19th Century, this area — even this close to Wellesley Square — was little more than bucolic countryside.

The village of Wellesley in 1876. The house labeled 'A.H. Buck' is 12 Wellesley Avenue. Source: Atlas of Norfolk County, Massachusetts (1876)

The village of Wellesley in 1876. The house labeled ‘A.H. Buck’ is 12 Wellesley Avenue.
Source: Atlas of Norfolk County, Massachusetts (1876)

The success of the Convalescent Home was immediate:

“The influence of the pure country air has been beneficial in every case, serving to complete a cure already begun, and having a favorable effect even in cases beyond recovery. But, even if its remedial power were less than it actually is, the delight which the children feel — many of whom have never been beyond the narrow and gloomy courts and alleys of the city — at finding themselves in the open air, in the broad and sweet fields, amidst flowers and birds, and the pleasant sights and sounds of the country, would be an ample return for all that the Home has cost.” — Annual Report of The Children’s Hospital (1876)

And so each year, from May until October, Children’s Hospital sent to Wellesley as many of its recovering patients as it possibly could. It’s important to note, however, the separation that existed between the hospital and the Convalescent Home. Although the doctors and nurses of the hospital decided which children were granted a trip to the country, the Convalescent Home was run entirely by the Ladies’ Aid Association, whose efforts were absolutely crucial because the Convalescent Home — just like Children’s Hospital — was free for those patients whose parents couldn’t afford the care and thus relied almost entirely on donations.

One of the most generous gifts the Convalescent Home ever received was given in 1890 when Horatio Hollis Hunnewell — Wellesley’s greatest benefactor and one of the directors of Children’s Hospital — donated 32 acres of open farmland at the southern edge of Wellesley on Forest Street. (Half of the property actually extended over the town border into Needham.) This gift, along with money raised by the Ladies’ Aid Association, enabled the construction of a larger Convalescent Home — the impetus being that eight years earlier, Children’s Hospital moved into a new building on Huntington Avenue that allowed the doctors to treat many more patients and thus required additional space for its convalescents as well.

To say that the new Convalescent Home on Forest Street was an improvement over the house at 12 Wellesley Avenue would be a vast understatement. Designed by Henry S. Hunnewell and George R. Shaw — the same architects of Wellesley’s Town Hall and who both happened to be related to Horatio Hunnewell) — the new home probably could have been mistaken for Children’s Hospital itself.

The Convalescent Home on Forest Street -- built 1892 Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1899)

The Convalescent Home on Forest Street — built 1892
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1899)

Floor plan of the 1892 Convalescent Home  Annual Report of the Children's Hospital (1892)

Floor plan of the 1892 Convalescent Home
Source: Annual Report of The Children’s Hospital (1892)

Source: Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts (1897)

Source: Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts (1897)

But, alas, the new Convalescent Home stood for only eleven years. In 1903, a fire caused by a defective chimney reduced the entire structure to rubble. Miraculously, no children were injured in the blaze.

(Despite the lack of any casualties, the Wellesley Fire Department received significant criticism after responding to the fire nearly 20 minutes after the first alarm was sounded. Furthermore, once the firefighters arrived, it was reported that they didn’t do enough to stop the fire from spreading and even refused to accept any assistance from the Needham Fire Department. Although the firefighters from Wellesley blamed poor water pressure for their lack of effectiveness, this was not the only time in the early history of the Wellesley Fire Department that it was called out for its poor record.)

Two years later, in 1905, construction of a new building for the Convalescent Home — although not nearly as impressive — was completed on the site of the old one.

The Convalescent Home on Forest Street -- built 1905

The Convalescent Home on Forest Street — built 1905
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1908)

Floor plan of the 1905 Convalescent Home  Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1909)

Floor plan of the 1905 Convalescent Home
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1909)

So what was day-to-day life like for the children at the Convalescent Home? Well, for those that weren’t bedridden — even those on crutches and in wheelchairs — their time was spent mostly outside playing games and enjoying the sunshine and fresh air. There was even a pet donkey that was hooked up to a cart so that boys and girls could take rides “as far as the donkey would take them.”

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1901)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1901)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1916)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1916)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1927)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1927)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1937)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1937)

If the weather was not great — which was often a problem after 1894, when the Convalescent Home began operating year-round — there were large indoor playrooms and covered terraces. The responsibility then fell on the nurses to do what they could to keep the children active.

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1908)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1908)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1938)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1938)

This included — perhaps to the disappointment of the children — establishing a school within the Convalescent Home. But don’t forget, some of them were stuck there for upwards of a year. This absence from their regular school would have created significant problems if they were unable to keep up with their studies.

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1934)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1934)

But despite all of these activities, living at the Convalescent Home must have gotten pretty dull. Which is why the holidays were so important. They were a chance for churches, social groups, and organizations from the various schools in Wellesley to visit the home and entertain the children with ice cream socials, puppet shows, theatrical productions, and concerts. And every July 4th, the Wellesley Post of the American Legion would put on a fireworks display. It was the least they could do to provide a moment of joy for these sick children.

At this point, I should stress once again that even though a large proportion of the children lived at the Convalescent Home for many months, this wasn’t an institution where sick or disabled children were sent to live out their childhoods. Their admissions were entirely temporary with a shuttle from the hospital arriving each week to drop off more patients and pick up those children who were better. Early on, this shuttle was actually a special trolley sent from Boston to Wellesley Hills, where a horse-drawn barge met the children and brought them to the Convalescent Home. This trolley and barge system was phased out in 1918 when the Convalescent Home purchased an ambulance that could take the kids back and forth between Wellesley and Boston.

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1913)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1913)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1935)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1935)

And should any children not respond to treatment at the Convalescent Home or their condition worsen, they were sent back to the Hospital or to a separate institution for permanent living. (Although it’s possible that a few children could have died while at the Convalescent Home, there doesn’t seem to be any information that suggests there were burials on site.)

That said, the Convalescent Home had a remarkable success rate in helping children recover from debilitating illnesses — specifically, rheumatic fever and tuberculosis. Part of that success against the latter of those diseases was the result of a open-air therapy program where the children would spend both day and night in unplastered wooden shacks with sliding walls so as to bring in as much fresh air as possible. At first, this treatment was nothing more than an experiment — a single 40’x20’ structure was constructed off Seaver Street in 1903, in the months following the devastating fire, when the Convalescent Home was temporarily located at 5 Park Avenue in the former house of L. Allen Kingsbury. (The home was razed in the early 2000s.)

Temporary open-air shack off Seaver Street  Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

Temporary open-air shack off Seaver Street
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

If living in a shack in the winter sounds cold and uncomfortable, it was. But at least they had lots of warm clothes!

“At night each child wore, under the blankets, woollen undergarments, flannel nightgown, bed-shoes, and hood, and was finally put into a big flannel bag, which was fastened round the neck.” — Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1904)

But this experiment was so successful that when the new building for the Convalescent Home was completed in 1905, the entire back wing was devoted to this open-air treatment of tuberculosis. (See floorplan above.)

Open-air shack at the rear of the 1905 Convalescent Home  Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1905)

Open-air shack at the rear of the 1905 Convalescent Home
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1905)

Playroom inside open-air shack  Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1905)

Playroom inside open-air shack
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1905)

Bedroom inside open-air shack  Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1905)

Bedroom inside open-air shack
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1905)

By the 1920s — following the development of a vaccine for tuberculosis — the Convalescent Home was able to phase out the shack system and focus its energies on helping children recover from other illnesses. The shacks were therefore converted into an expansive solarium for patients primarily suffering from rheumatic heart disease.

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1927)

Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1927)

Young children receiving sun treatment Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1927)

Young children receiving sun treatment
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1927)

In addition, a significant physical therapy unit was installed within the Convalescent Home.

Patient undergoing physical therapy Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1935)

Patient undergoing physical therapy
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1935)

Posture lesson Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1934)

Posture lesson
Source: Annual Report of the Convalescent Home (1934)

The mid-1940s marked the beginning of the end of the Convalescent Home, when Children’s Hospital sought to consolidate its treatment and convalescent facilities. By that time, doctors understood the interdependence of treatment and recovery. It just didn’t make sense to keep the facilities ten miles apart. In addition, with the further development of antibiotics and more advanced surgical procedures, the period of convalescence was significantly shorter than it used to be and so fewer patients were being sent out to Wellesley.

The Convalescent Home was therefore forced to evolve once again — this time focusing almost exclusively on young children with cerebral palsy, and beginning in 1950, both pediatric and adult patients with polio.

Respirator unit for the treatment of polio  Source: Report of the Children's Medical Center (1946-1951)

Respirator unit for the treatment of polio
Source: Report of the Children’s Medical Center (1946-1951)

But in 1959, what treatment programs remained in Wellesley were moved to Boston and the entire property was sold to the Babson Institute. The front portion of the former convalescent home is now a student dormitory with administrative offices located in the rear of the building.

Forest Hall  (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in November 2013)

The former Convalescent Home (now Forest Hall)
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in November 2013)

Even though the Convalescent Home no longer exists today, Boston Children’s Hospital continues to be one of the top medical centers in the world. In fact, the most recent U.S. News & World Report ranking of the nation’s hospitals lists Children’s Hospital as #1 in seven out of ten specialities — everything from neonatal care to pediatric cardiology.

But, surely, Children’s Hospital couldn’t have developed into the facility we now know had it not been for the Convalescent Home in Wellesley. It didn’t just give the hospital the ability to treat more patients, it also gave doctors and medical researchers opportunities to explore innovative treatments for once-crippling diseases.

Sources:

  • Norfolk County Registry of Deeds
  • Annual Reports of The Children’s Hospital (1869 – 1898)
  • Annual Reports of the Convalescent Home of The Children’s Hospital, Boston (1899 – 1947)
  • Reports of the Children’s Medical Center (1946 – 1955)
  • Harvard College Class of 1869 Second Triennial Report of the Secretary (1875)
  • Atlas of Norfolk County, Massachusetts by W.A. Sherman (1876)
  • Atlas of Wellesley, Massachusetts by George W. Stadley & Co. (1897)
  • ‘The Convalescent Home at Wellesley Hills, Mass. — Help for Helpless Children’ by Edith A. Sawyer in the February 20th, 1897 issue of The Churchman
  • Boston Daily Globe: 21 January 1903; 22 January 1903; 16 January 1937
  • History of the Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts by Joseph E. Fiske (1917)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 17 April 1925; 5 April 1929;  17 April 1931; 12 May 1933; 19 February 1959
  • U.S. News & World Report rankings of children’s hospitals, 2013-14 [accessed in November 2013]
  • Google Dictionary [convalescent]

Benjamin Proctor Jr. — Wellesley’s most unknown well-known architect

Here’s a trivia question for you: What do the following buildings/structures have in common?

Babson's Reports headquarters (1919)

Babson’s Reports headquarters (1919)

Community Playhouse (originally the Babson Society House)

Community Playhouse — originally the Babson Society House (1922)

L. Allen Kingsbury School (1923)

L. Allen Kingsbury School (1923)

The Wellesley Trust Company building (1928)

The Wellesley Trust Company building (1928)

Isaac Sprague Memorial Tower (1928)

Isaac Sprague Memorial Tower (1928)

Original location of the Wellesley Hills A&P Market (1929)

Original location of the Wellesley Hills A&P Market (1929)

The Belvedere Apartments (1930)

The Belvedere Apartments (1930)

Annie F. Warren School (1935)

Annie F. Warren School (1935)

Give up? Well, the answer is that all of them were designed by Benjamin Proctor Jr.

Other notable works credited to Proctor include Perrin School (which burned down in 1984) and a few buildings on the Babson College campus, as well as the 1924 renovation of the interior of the Unitarian Church.

Marshall L. Perrin School (1931)

Marshall L. Perrin School (1931)
(Posted with permission from the Wellesley Townsman)

But despite his influence in the early development of Wellesley — specifically Wellesley Hills — there’s really not a whole lot to say about Benjamin Proctor Jr. He was just an architect with his own private practice who was called upon to design a disproportionately large number of buildings constructed in Wellesley from the late 1910s through the 1930s.

So how in the world did Proctor get hired so frequently?  One word: connections. Having close ties with three of the most important developers in Wellesley during the 1920s and 1930s — Isaac Sprague, Roger W. Babson, and the Town of Wellesley — Proctor was brought in whenever a significant project was undertaken. In fact, of the nine structures above, all but the building that’s now home to Marathon Sports were constructed by either Sprague, Babson, or the Town. (And in the case of the Clock Tower, both Sprague and the Town.)

You also can’t ignore the fact that the architectural style in which he specialized  – Colonial Revival — just happened to be the preference of the majority of the townspeople. This was especially true of Roger Babson. Actually, to say that Babson was an admirer of Colonial Revival — specifically, Neo-Georgian architecture — would be a vast understatement. Just look at the campus of Babson College. It’s almost all Neo-Georgian buildings!

In fact, Roger Babson loved Proctor’s work so much that he hired him to design his new house off Wellesley Avenue:

28 Swarthmore Road (1919)

28 Swarthmore Road (1919)

You’ll also find more than a few dozen other houses that Proctor designed in Wellesley — particularly in the Wellesley Farms and Country Club neighborhoods. Here are just four of them:

139 Abbott Road (1920)

139 Abbott Road (1920)

52 Garden Road (1926)

52 Garden Road (1926)

56 Whiting Road (1930)

56 Whiting Road (1930)

22 Valley Road (1934)

22 Valley Road (1934)

At this point, it probably goes without saying that Proctor really liked brick and stone. In fact, with the exception of the A&P Market, I can’t seem to find a Proctor-designed building or house with a clapboard exterior.

It’s also worth mentioning that there’s yet another Roger Babson connection to one of the houses above — 56 Whiting Road — which was built for his daughter, Edith Babson Webber, and now serves as the President’s House for Babson College. And for those who thought that’s the only other link between Proctor and Babson, how about the fact that Proctor lived for most of the nearly 25 years he spent in Wellesley in Roger Babson’s former house (and the original location of the Babson Institute) at 31 Abbott Road?

So given all that Proctor built, it’s an absolute tragedy that few people know anything about him, let alone his name. In the 74 years since his death at the age of sixty-one — even though his buildings are some of the most recognizable in all of Wellesley — he’s been almost completely forgotten.

It therefore would make sense to end this post with a call to honor Proctor’s legacy by creating a plaque and affixing it to one of the buildings he designed so that everyone can appreciate the impact he had on the development of Wellesley. But there’s already such a plaque in existence (on the Sprague Clock Tower):

SpraguePlaque_21Oct2013_labeled

I’ll therefore put the onus on you — past and present citizens of Wellesley — to do what you can to spread the word about the impact Benjamin Proctor Jr. had on the development of our town. Take away the buildings he designed and Wellesley would be a completely different place. So isn’t it only fair that he get some name recognition?

Sources:

  • Norfolk County Registry of Deeds
  • Town of Wellesley Building Department
  • Wellesley Townsman: 5 September 1919; 10 February 1922; 1 August 1924; 6 January 1928; 22 June 1928; 21 December 1928; 24 May 1929; 29 November 1929; 24 July 1931; 8 June 1934; 30 August 1935; 22 December 1939 16 February 1984
  • Continuity and Change: Babson College, 1919-1994 by John R. Mulkern (1995)

Note that all photos in this post were taken by Joshua Dorin in October 2013.

Longfellow Pond

This is my first collaboration. Tycho McManus, a college junior who lives on Mulherin Lane — right near where I grew up on Standish Road — approached me about the idea of co-writing a post on Longfellow Pond, a small body of water situated within the Rosemary Brook Town Forest that both of us spent much time around during our youths. What follows is the product of this collaboration.

Living in Wellesley can be rough if you’re a nature lover. There really aren’t that many places in town where you can escape the sights and sounds of suburban life. That’s precisely why Longfellow Pond is so great. It’s one of our few natural oases in an almost entirely developed town.

The irony, of course, is that Longfellow Pond is not natural. Rather, it’s entirely man-made and, furthermore, very little of the surrounding environment has been untouched by humans. Look closely and this should be obvious, from the dam and concrete piers at the north end of the pond to the mysterious boulder marking the Hastings family burial plot. (Not to mention the sewer and gas lines that run underneath the pond.)

But that evidence of human activity doesn’t even come close to providing the complete story about Longfellow Pond. In fact, there were probably few places in Wellesley that were ever dirtier, noisier, and more heavily polluted.

Before we get to that part of the story, however, something needs to be said about the origins of the pond. Unfortunately, the details regarding its creation are a bit fuzzy. The only piece of evidence is a single sentence from Joseph E. Fiske’s History of the Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts: “On Worcester Turnpike, Rosemary Brook — now Longfellow Pond — was dammed and a mill built by Charles Pettee in 1815 for a nail factory.” But Fiske doesn’t give us any details on who Pettee was or why he chose to dam the brook.

Our best guess is that the answers to those questions have something to do with the industrial activities in Newton Upper Falls — in particular, the Newton Iron Works, which began operation in 1800 in the vicinity of Hemlock Gorge (south of Worcester Street at the Wellesley-Newton border near the current site of Echo Bridge). At that time, the process of manufacturing nails using machinery (rather than forging each nail by hand) had just been invented and was a crucial part of the first wave of the Industrial Revolution. Given the success of the Newton Iron Works on the Charles River, perhaps the industrialists that set up those factories saw nearby Rosemary Brook as an opportunity to manufacture even more nails.

Dam at Longfellow Pond  (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Dam at Longfellow Pond
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Close-up of dam at Longfellow Pond (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Close-up of dam at Longfellow Pond
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

So who was Charles Pettee? In short, we haven’t got a clue. Although there is record of a “Charles F. Pettee” who owned land in the vicinity of Hemlock Gorge and was a part of village life in Newton Upper Falls during the 1820s and 1830s, there is nothing to link him directly to Longfellow Pond. It also could be that Charles Pettee was related to Otis Pettee, the longtime superintendent of the Pettee iron and cotton mills along Hemlock Gorge beginning in the early 1820s. But neither Charles F. Pettee nor Otis Pettee appear to have lived in the area by 1815. So the mystery of Charles Pettee remains.

Other than Fiske’s History of Wellesley, the earliest reference to a nail factory at Longfellow Pond comes from a deed dated January 1, 1816 from Ephraim Ware — owner of 303 Worcester Street as well as much of the land around the northern half of Longfellow Pond — to Benjamin Knights, a nailor from Newton. This isn’t to say that Charles Pettee didn’t manufacture nails there in 1815 or earlier — even the description of the one acre of land conveyed in this deed makes reference to an “old dam” — but we wonder why there isn’t any deed or lease from Ware to Pettee. Regardless, it appears that the nail factory was only in operation for a short time, as Knights sold the property back to Ware in 1817.

The next time any mill at Longfellow Pond appears in Town or County records is in 1825. This mill, however, manufactured paper instead of nails. Alas, just as with the nail factory, many of the details regarding the paper mill have been lost to history. But there are still enough to tell a story. So let’s break down what we know by using the five Ws and one H.

The who and when are by far the simplest to answer. Just take a look at the following list of the owners of the paper mill:

  • 1825-1830: Charles & Thomas Rice
  • 1830-1835: Henry F. Bartlett
  • 1835-1836: Thomas Orr
  • 1836: Isaac Keyes
  • 1836-1847: Luther & Zenas Crane
  • 1847-1868: Nathan Longfellow

It probably goes without saying that the pond was named for the last person on that list — Nathan Longfellow — although many people mistakenly think that the famous poet, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, was its namesake. (Coincidently, they were third cousins.)

And to be precise, it was actually known as Longfellow’s Pond up until the late 1910s and early 1920s, at which point the possessive form was dropped in favor of the pond’s current name. Certainly a better choice than going back to its original name — ‘the mill pond.’

We’re also able to determine with a fair degree of certainty why the paper mill was established. Just as the village of Upper Falls had become a leading supplier of nails, Lower Falls — specifically, Washington Street and lower Walnut Street — had developed by 1825 into one of the larger paper manufacturing centers in all of New England. Given that land and water rights were in extremely high demand, the old iron factory and dam at Longfellow Pond offered a perfect opportunity to establish yet another paper mill.

The first to do so were Charles Rice — already an owner of one of the paper mills in Lower Falls — and his brother, Thomas Rice — who would later acquire a separate paper mill in Lower Falls as well.

In addition, a third Rice brother would be affiliated with the paper mills, and so would two of Thomas’ sons. Given the close connection of the mills to the development of Lower Falls, as well as the involvement of the Rice family in pretty much all aspects of village life from the early 1800s until around the 1950s, it shouldn’t be surprising that the Rices were perhaps the most important family in the 300-year history of Lower Falls. Look closely and you’ll still see their presence there today: the two-story building which is occupied in part by Dunkin’ Donuts has its name — Rice Block — inscribed on its facade. And the family’s influence would even extend beyond Lower Falls — another son of Thomas Rice, Alexander Hamilton Rice, was Mayor of Boston from 1856-57 and Governor of Massachusetts from 1876-78.

It’s also worth saying something about the family of Luther and Zenas Crane, another pair of brothers who got their start in the paper mills in Lower Falls before operating the one at Longfellow Pond. In particular, their uncle — also named Zenas Crane — founded Crane & Co. in 1801 along the Housatonic River in Dalton, Massachusetts (which remains to this day the leading supplier of paper used to make United States currency). In fact, before heading out to western Massachusetts, Zenas Crane (the elder) had first learned the paper-making trade in Lower Falls.

As to where exactly the paper mill at Longfellow Pond was located, we wish this was the easy part — after all, we know from maps and deeds that the mill was located near where the dam is currently located.

Source: 1856 Map of Needham

Map showing paper mill at Longfellow Pond
Source: 1856 Map of Needham

Unfortunately, there’s no map, image, or text that gives us a precise description of where the mill building sat. The only evidence comes from the old conglomerate-like foundations around the brook at the north end of Longfellow Pond. Although much of it is missing in certain areas, the remaining pieces of the foundation seem to suggest that whatever mill was once there was not simply some shack. Rather, it was a more elaborate structure that was built over the dam and then extended along the eastern side of the brook. (There may also have been more than one building.)

There is, of course, one building affiliated with the paper mill that is still standing today. And that’s 303 Worcester Street. Built in 1790 by the aforementioned Ephraim Ware, the house also served as the residence of mill owners Isaac Keyes and Nathan Longfellow. That shouldn’t be surprising given its close proximity to the pond.

303 Worcester Street in 1910 and 2013 (Left: posted with permission from the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University)

303 Worcester Street in 1910 and 2013
(Left: Posted with permission from the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University)
(Right: Photo taken by Tycho McManus in August 2013)

Source: Bing Maps

Source: Bing Maps

That leaves just the what — what did they make? — and the how — how did they make it? OK, we know they made paper. But what kind of paper? Well, again, not a whole lot is known about the products that were manufactured there. All we can say is that the Crane brothers made paper (lamp) shades and Longfellow manufactured “paper hangings” (i.e., wallpaper).

As for how they made it, that’s just one big question mark. There are absolutely no details whatsoever regarding the inner workings of the paper mill at Longfellow Pond. That said, we know a lot about the paper mills at Lower Falls. It’s therefore probable — given that the Rice and Crane brothers worked at both sites — that whatever was going on at Longfellow Pond was just done on a much smaller scale.

So it’s highly likely that the first step at the Longfellow Pond paper mill would have been the shredding of used linen or cotton rags and clothing. (This was, after all, before the advent of wood pulp paper.) This part of the papermaking process was actually one of the main reasons the mill needed to be adjacent to the dam — falling water would power a hollander beater that literally beat the cloth rags into a watery pulp.

The other part of papermaking was the actual making of paper. That meant — at least during the earliest years of the mill — that workers collected the pulp on a screen, compressed it using a vice-like machine, and then hung the sheet to dry.

Source: Wiswall (1938)

Making paper by hand
Source: Wiswall (1938)

However, by the 1840s and 1850s — when the Crane brothers and Nathan Longfellow operated the mill — paper-making technology had advanced to the point where instead of manufacturing the paper by hand, the mill workers simply oversaw a complex machine that consisted of two main parts: (i) a large cylinder with wire mesh sides that was rotated while half submerged in a vat of watery pulp and (ii) a conveyor belt that fed the screened pulp into a compress. Unlike manufacturing paper by hand, this machine produced long sheets of paper which could then be dyed, patterned, and cut.

Well, whatever equipment was at the paper mill at Longfellow Pond was lost when the structure burned down in 1868. At that point, Nathan Longfellow had enough with manufacturing and chose not to rebuild the mill. Instead, he spent the remainder of his life tending to his farm. (Longfellow — a Bowdoin graduate who spent nine years as a teacher in Georgia before moving to Wellesley — also kept himself busy by serving on the Needham School Committee for nearly 25 years between 1845 and 1875.)

So that marks the end of the story about the paper mill. But we aren’t even close to finishing our discussion on the history of industry at Longfellow Pond. In fact, there’s an entire second chapter involving ice harvesting. So why don’t we use the five Ws and one H to break down this subject as well?

This time, let’s start with the what and why because they’re really quite simple: ice was harvested from the pond each winter because people needed it to keep their meats and dairy from spoiling during the warmer months.

The how is also pretty straightforward. At several times each winter, after the ice on the pond was thick enough (usually about 10 inches or so), workers walked out onto the frozen pond and — with the help of horses — cleared it of snow and cut out large sheets of ice which were then further reduced into small blocks. The men then pried those blocks out with long-handled chisels and dragged them along a channel of open water to a long conveyor belt which sent the ice onto land and up and into a large storage house — the so-called “ice house” — where it was stacked neatly and covered with sawdust (which would prevent the ice from melting). Ice dealers then transported the blocks to customers either by horse-drawn cart or, starting in 1912, by truck.

If that description wasn’t clear enough, how about a video showing the ice harvesting process? (Note that the movie below shows Stillwater Lake — a reservoir that covers 315-acres in the Poconos — which was way larger than Longfellow Pond. Ice harvesting at both sites, however, was very similar.)

As for the who and when, it all started in 1869 — the year after Nathan Longfellow’s paper mill burned down — when he leased the property at the northern end of the pond to Asa H. Jones — an ice dealer — and Charles H. Hyde — a grocer in Newton Lower Falls (in the building now occupied by Lower Falls Wine Co.). Together, Jones and Hyde started the Newton Ice Company. But they wouldn’t run the business for long. In fact, the Newton Ice Company had no less than six different groups of proprietors during its first fifty years in operation.

Source: Newton Directory (1877)

Advertisement for the Newton Ice Company
Source: Newton Directory (1877)

By 1925, the Newton Ice Company had been taken over by the Metropolitan Ice Company, a larger business that harvested ice on several ponds throughout the suburbs of Boston. (There were also at least two other waterbodies in town that were used for ice harvesting: (i) the Diehl’s pond on Linden Street on the current site of Roche Bros. and (ii) Morses Pond which was operated by the Boston Ice Company.)

So where were the ice houses located on the land surrounding Longfellow Pond? Well, there were actually two different locations. Before 1923, the ice houses sat right at the north edge of the pond (more or less on the current site of Ollie Turner Park).

Source: Norfolk County Registry of Deeds

Source: Norfolk County Registry of Deeds

In fact, we actually found a photo — albeit, one that isn’t very clear — that shows these ice houses around 1903.

Posted with permission from the Wellesley Townsman

Photograph of the ice houses at Longfellow Pond (circa 1903)
(Posted with permission from the Wellesley Townsman)

Just for reference, this photo was taken standing on the old Worcester Turnpike (the carriage lane) at Longfellow Road looking southeast. You see the new Worcester Street in the foreground, along with two sets of trolley tracks for the Boston & Worcester Street Railway separating the eastbound and westbound lanes. Today, much of the land on the opposite side of Worcester Street is now either forested or part of the eastern end of the Standish Estates (i.e., Carver, Dudley, and Winslow Roads).

Unfortunately, the ice houses shown in the photo burned down in 1923. But here’s a photo of what we think are the remains of one of their foundations (located in the woods to the west of the dam):

Ruins of the ice house (?)  (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Ruins of the ice house (?)
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

A new 32’x113’ icehouse was then built to the west of the northern end of the Longfellow Pond on the current site of Dudley Road. It’s believed that the concrete piers that stick out of the pond are remnants of the ramp that led to this second icehouse. There are also three concrete posts nearby that were probably part an old fence that once marked a path that led down to the pond.

Ruins of the ice harvesting   (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in September 2013)

Concrete piers
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in September 2013)

Concrete posts (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Concrete posts
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

It’s not precisely known when ice harvesting on Longfellow Pond stopped, but the records seem to suggest it was around the late 1920s. Not very surprising, considering that by then most people in Wellesley and the surrounding towns already had their own electric refrigerators. But there were still some who either preferred the old-fashioned icebox or could not afford a new fridge. So the Metropolitan Ice Company continued to store ice there from other lakes and ponds up until the early 1940s (at which point the ice house was briefly used as a rifle range by the Massachusetts Guard). It appears then that the ice house sat vacant until it was razed sometime after 1947 but before 1950 (when Dudley Road was laid out).

So that’s it for the story about industry at Longfellow Pond. Well, actually, we failed to mention one other industrial activity that took place there. Starting in 1881, Nathan Longfellow leased the use of the dam to the Waste Recovery Company, a business that we know nothing about. But it certainly doesn’t sound very environmentally friendly. And by 1885, the dam had been taken over by a wool cleansing business. Not exactly something you wanted right next to where your ice was produced.

But we’re still not done yet! There’s one more subject that needs to be discussed: What’s the deal with the Hastings family burial plot on the eastern side of the pond?

Hastings burial plot (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Hastings burial plot
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

It’s almost impossible to imagine today, but the wooded area around the grave marker was once a small 2 ¾ acre farm that was occupied by the Hastings family for nearly a century, from 1837 — hence the date on the boulder — until 1930.

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley

To be honest, there isn’t a whole lot that people will find interesting about the Hastings family. It was just Aaron Hastings — a simple yeoman — and his wife, Eliza, along with their children, John and Sarah (and an adopted orphan, Richard Cunningham).

Besides John Hastings — who was a handyman and did some work filing saw blades and cutting wood for the Newton Ice Company in his later years — the Hastings family had little to no affiliation with the industries at Longfellow Pond despite their close proximity. They either just worked on their farm or found manufacturing jobs elsewhere.

(Richard Cunningham was, however, a notable exception. For unknown reasons — perhaps he was gifted at school or just enjoyed business — Cunningham left the Hastings house at the age of fourteen to enter into the leather trade, eventually becoming successful enough to establish his own firm in Boston. And locally, he was known as one of Wellesley’s most involved citizens, serving as a member of the Board of Selectmen for thirteen years and as Assessor for over two decades.)

The precise date that the Hastings house was removed is unknown. Our best guess is the mid-1940s, long after the death in 1930 of its last occupant, 84-year-old John Hastings (who was found by Cunningham on verge of death, lying in bed suffering from pneumonia in the unheated house during the heart of winter).

Today, all of the farmland and pasture that once surrounded the house is completely covered with large trees and overgrowth. But if you hack your way through the forest and dig through the leaves and detritus, you’ll find a few relics of the old Hastings homestead:

Ruins of the Hastings homestead (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Ruins of the Hastings homestead
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

More ruins of the Hastings homestead (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

More ruins of the Hastings homestead
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Even more ruins of the Hastings homestead (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in September 2013)

Even more ruins of the Hastings homestead
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in September 2013)

There are also the vestiges of Rosemary Street — an old cart path connecting Worcester and Oakland Streets that was probably used almost exclusively by the Hastings. You can actually still walk on most of the northern end of Rosemary Street, which serves as the access road from Route 9 and as part of the walking trail around the pond. And even some of the southern section — which has been mostly abandoned — is still navigable in places:

Abandoned section of Rosemary Street  (Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

Abandoned section of Rosemary Street
(Photo taken by Tycho McManus in July 2013)

And as for who’s buried in the Hastings burial plot, we have no idea. It’s definitely not John Hastings or his sister, Sarah — whose graves are both located at the East Parish Burying Ground in Newton — but it could be their parents, Aaron and Eliza. (There’s a United States veteran marker next to the burial plot, but we think that was placed there mistakenly in honor of John Hastings, who was a member of Company K of the 42nd Regiment of the Massachusetts Infantry during the Civil War.)

It wasn’t until 1947 — seventeen years after the death of John Hastings — that the Town purchased the old Hastings farm (along with the abandoned property of the Metropolitan Ice Company) for the development of a recreational area. In particular, Town officials had been concerned that the post-war construction boom — which included much of the Standish and Sheridan Estates — would continue to eat up any and all undeveloped land, leaving behind few places in Wellesley where residents could enjoy the outdoors.

And they were right. Today, Longfellow Pond — along with Morses Pond, Lake Waban, and Boulder Brook Reservation — are perhaps the only spots in Wellesley that really make you forget about suburbia and force you to appreciate the natural world. Of course, now you know just how natural Longfellow Pond really is.

Sources:

  • Norfolk County Registry of Deeds
  • Federal Censuses of 1820, 1850, 1860, 1870, 1880, 1900, 1910
  • 1856 Map of Needham by Henry Francis Walling
  • Newton Directories: 1868-1934
  • History of Newton, Massachusetts by Samuel Francis Smith (1880)
  • The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 47 (1893)
  • Dedham Historical Register, Volume 4 by the Dedham Historical Society (1893)
  • 1897 Atlas of Wellesley by George W. Stadley & Co.
  • Obituary Record of the Graduates of Bowdoin College and the Medical School of Maine (1899)
  • Epitaphs from Graveyards in Wellesley by George Kuhn Clarke (1900)
  • Crane, 1648-1902 (1902)
  • Vital Records of Newton, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850 by the New England Historic Genealogical Society (1905)
  • History and Genealogy of the Jewetts of America by Frederick Clarke Jewett (1908)
  • Memorial Biographies of the New England Historic Genealogical Society, Towne Memorial Fund (1908)
  • General Catalogue of Bowdoin College and the Medical School of Maine by Bowdoin College (1912)
  • History of Needham, Massachusetts: 1711-1911 by George Kuhn Clarke (1912)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 31 May 1912; 3 October 1913; 25 October 1918; 12 December 1919; 28 September 1923; 19 October 1923; 26 February 1926; 28 October 1927; 5 November 1929; 21 February 1930; 28 February 1930; 18 October 1935; 17 February 1939; 3 April 1941; 5 November 1942; 20 May 1943; 1 June 1945; 6 July 1945; 3 April 1947; 10 July 1947; 17 January 1952; 22 March 1956; 29 March 1956
  • History of the Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts by Joseph E. Fiske (1917)
  • One Hundred Years of Paper Making by Clarence Augustus Wiswall (1938)
  • A Longfellow Genealogy by Russell Clare Farnham (2002)
  • The Frozen Water Trade: How Ice From New England Lakes Kept the World Cool by Gavin Weightman (2003)
  • Rag Paper Manufacture in the United States, 1801-1900 by A.J. Valente (2010)
  • The Makers of the Mold: A History of Newton Upper Falls, Massachusetts by Kenneth W. Newcomb (accessed in September 2013)
  • Interment.net — Old East Parish Burying Ground in Newton, Massachusetts (accessed in July 2013)

Wellesley High School

(Note: This is a long post.) 

One of my biggest regrets in life — please don’t laugh — is that I didn’t get involved in the debate over the preservation of the 1938 High School. I was off at college and grad school and by the time I returned to Wellesley in 2010, the matter was settled. The Town had voted to tear down the old high school and construct a new one.

Had I been in Wellesley during this time, I would have tried to contribute what I felt was missing from the public debate: the story of Wellesley High School. Any fight to preserve a building must focus on the people affiliated with it and the impact that the structure has had on the community. If you concern yourself with just the bricks and mortar, then only the architecture wonks are going to care.

But to be quite honest, I don’t think this contribution would have changed the outcome. It was clear that a very, very long time had passed since the townspeople had really thought about the importance and symbolism of the 1938 High School. How else can you explain the mishmash of additions and the school’s poor upkeep over the years?

This post, therefore, is probably a few years — actually more like a few decades — too late. But I hope that it can provide a few lessons. First, if you build something that you’re proud of, don’t forget that feeling and bastardize it later on down the road. And second, if you don’t know the history of a particular building or house, that doesn’t mean that it’s unimportant. Although ignorance may expedite the decision-making process, you can end up looking quite foolish when everyone realizes what was lost.

So what exactly was lost when the 1938 High School was razed last year? Well, more than just seventy-four years of memories. When that building was constructed, it served as a symbol for the evolution of Wellesley High School from a single classroom with a few dozen students and only one teacher to one of the leading secondary institutions in the Commonwealth.

How the high school got to that point is a rather complex story. In fact, to fully understand it, I need to discuss the development of secondary education in Massachusetts, a subject that I realize may not be of great interest to very many people. So I’ve tried to keep it brief and narrowed two centuries of history into four bullet points (with a little bit of expanded commentary).

Chapter 1: The (Incomplete) History of Secondary Education in Massachusetts

  • In 1647, Massachusetts passed a law that required towns with more than 100 families to establish a central grammar school.

This wasn’t the kind of grammar school that you’re probably thinking about. It wasn’t a K-8 school, but rather a “Latin grammar school” that only taught Latin, Ancient Greek, and maybe some English. Its only objective was to prepare boys for college, specifically Harvard (whose sole requirement for admission up until 1807 was the ability to read and speak both Latin and Greek). If you didn’t have plans to go to Harvard, you probably didn’t attend grammar school.

But that doesn’t mean that you skipped school entirely. An additional requirement of this law was that “every township in this jurisdiction, after the Lord hath increased them to the number of fifty householders shall then forthwith appoint one within their town to teach all such children as shall resort to him to write and read…” In other words, boys and girls — even those lads who didn’t intend to go to grammar school — were at least given the opportunity to learn how to read and write.

  • Nearly a century and a half later, in 1789, it was mandated that all Massachusetts towns create school districts so that children living in rural areas far from town centers could receive an education.

This was the first real attempt to establish what became the modern public school system in terms of both inclusiveness and content. All children were now given the opportunity to receive at least a crude formal education: reading, writing, spelling, grammar, and arithmetic. But there wasn’t much in the way of secondary education. Once you matriculated through the district school, if you lived far from a Latin grammar school (or were a girl), then that was it.

  • Not too long after the 1789 law went into effect, private academies replaced Latin grammar schools as the primary option for secondary schooling. These academies — many of them coed — offered a comprehensive education not provided by the district or Latin grammar schools.

It seems that people finally realized that receiving a well-rounded education — not just English, Latin, and Greek, but also subjects like music, logic, and declamation — was beneficial even if you weren’t planning on attending college. The only problem was that many of these private academies accepted only boarding students. Any boy or girl who was needed at home couldn’t attend. So the completion of the district school curriculum still marked the end of formal education for most children.

  • In 1821, the first public high school was established: the English Classical School in Boston.

The increasing popularity of the private academies had made it clear to city and state leaders that the old form of public secondary education — Latin grammar schools — was antiquated. There was a clear benefit of and demand for a comprehensive secondary education. Therefore, in 1827, Massachusetts required that all towns of 500 families or more establish their own high schools. The rest is history.

So given this lesson in the development of the modern school system in Massachusetts, how does it all relate to the establishment of Wellesley High School?

Chapter 2: The (More Thorough But Still Incomplete) History of Secondary Education in Wellesley, Pre-1865

Prior to 1789 — when the creation of school districts became state law — education in Wellesley was pretty simple. A paid town citizen taught children how to read and write. That’s it. More often than not, these lessons were held in private homes, but there is record of a few very primitive schoolhouses around town at different times —  one on Church Street, another on Linden Street. There was even a “traveling school” that was literally moved — probably by animal — between the small clusters of people spread throughout Wellesley.

But as for secondary education, let’s face it. Wellesley was a poor and sparsely populated farming community. The children who lived here probably received no secondary education whatsoever. Although there was a Latin grammar school in Dedham — to which Wellesley belonged until 1711 — it’s unlikely that any children from what is now Wellesley attended. Unlike our town today, getting into Harvard wasn’t on anyone’s radar.

It probably goes without saying then that the 1789 law marked a significant change in our town’s public school system. Over the following few years, two schoolhouses were built in town: ‘West’ near Wellesley Square and ‘North’ on the site of Warren Elementary School near Lower Falls — both named so because they were in the western and northern sections of what was then Needham. A third school was added around 1854 in Wellesley Hills on the eastern corner of Washington and Forest Streets, and then a fourth — now the Fells Branch Library — was built in 1858.

But none of these district schools offered advanced education beyond the primary and grammar levels. (Now, I’m using ‘grammar’ in the conventional sense.) If you wanted to continue on in school, the only real option was to attend a private academy, of which most, if not all, were far from Wellesley. That changed, however, in 1854, when Nathaniel Topliff Allen established the West Newton English and Classical School, the first private high school in the area that accepted day students (including girls).

West Newton English and Classical School at 35 Webster Street

The West Newton English and Classical School at 35 Webster Street
(Posted with permission from the Newton Free Library)

Well, to be more precise, there was one other option for students — specifically girls — who desired advancing training that actually predates the founding of the West Newton English and Classical School. And that was the Normal School of Cyrus Peirce. Not technically a high school, the Normal School was where aspiring teachers of the primary and grammar levels learned their craft, practicing their instructional skills on classes of students at the affiliated Model School (which was basically a primary and grammar school that only had student-teachers).

Founded in 1839 in Lexington, Peirce’s Normal School — the first such school in the country — had moved in 1844 to the same house on Webster Street in West Newton where Nathaniel Allen would later establish his English and Classical School. The Normal School proved so successful that nine years later, in 1853, it moved once again, this time to Framingham. That freed up the space for Allen — who had been the head of the Model School — to open his own private school. (The Framingham Normal School has since evolved into Framingham State University.)

Chapter 3: The (Even More Thorough But Still Most Definitely Incomplete) History of Secondary Education in Wellesley, 1865-1938

In order to make this as simple as possible, I’ve broken down the history of Wellesley High School into four distinct periods:

  • Year One (1865)
  • The Early Years (1866 – 1885)
  • The Seldon Brown and Marshall Perrin Era (1886 – 1916)
  • The Evolution into a Modern High School (1917 – 1938)

Year One (1865):

The details regarding the founding of Wellesley High School — then known as ‘Needham High School, West Division’ or simply ‘West High School’ — are a tad bit unclear. It could have been that Needham reached the 500 family threshold that would have forced the town to establish its own high school. Or maybe it felt compelled to do so because several of the surrounding cities and towns — Newton, Natick, and Framingham to name a few — had recently opened their own high schools. Regardless, the members of the 1864 Annual Town Meeting voted to establish the Needham High School. Well…actually they voted to establish two high schools — one in the more populous eastern half of town (now Needham) and another in the western half (now Wellesley).

And so in April of 1865, just over 30 of Wellesley’s brightest students — hand-picked from the district schools — met in Wellesley Hills at Maugus Hall, a former storage shed that had been used during the 1834 construction of the Boston & Worcester Railroad before its conversion into a social hall. As you can imagine, this pseudo-schoolhouse was a far cry from what we have today. The only “teaching tools” were a platform that had been erected at the far end of the hall on which the principal (and only teacher), David Smith Farnham — a recent graduate of Amherst College — lectured, as well as a 12’x12’ recitation room in the cellar. Nevertheless, the first term seemed to go well. Farnham was quite a capable teacher and the students seemed to really like him.

Maugus Hall -- as shown when it was used by the Unitarian Church(Source: Early Days in Wellesley by Gamaliel Bradford [1928])

Maugus Hall — sometime between 1871 and 1887
when it was a church for the Unitarian Society
(Source: Early Days in Wellesley by Gamaliel Bradford [1928])

The second term also went smoothly. This time, however, the high school met on the second floor of Waban Hall (on the current site of the Waban Block at the southeast corner of Washington and Grove Streets in Wellesley Square), a move made as part of an arrangement where the high school would alternate locations (one term at a time) between Wellesley Hills and Wellesley Square so as not to favor one part of town over the other. The only drawback to this plan was that each term, the entire contents of the school — books, chairs, desks, etc. — had to be transported back and forth between these two locations. Not an easy task when all you had were horses and wagons.

The Early Years (1866 – 1885):

In the two decades between 1866 and 1885, Wellesley High School made huge strides forward, most obviously with regards to its schoolhouse and facilities. Neither Maugus Hall nor Waban Hall — which the High School alternated between through 1869 — were meant to be schools. They just provided the space needed to fit a few dozen students.

It wasn’t until 1870 that the high school held its first classes in a dedicated schoolhouse — the brand new Hunnewell School, located on the triangular lot bounded by Central Street, Weston Road, and Cross Street. But even then, the high school had to share the three-story building with the primary and grammar levels. This held true even after the high school moved yet again, in 1875, this time to the newly constructed Shaw School on the eastern corner of Washington and Forest Streets. It was, however, a markedly better facility than either Maugus Hall or Waban Hall.

Progress was less steady, however, when it came to the principals. Although Farnham was great, others were god-awful. And since the principals were the only teachers during those earliest years, the success of the school depended almost entirely on their capabilities.

Just check out this list of principals of the high school (up through 1941). What should really be striking is the inexperience of the principals in the top half of the list compared to those at the bottom.

1865-1866: David Smith Farnham (born 1834 — Amherst ‘64)
1866-1867: Thomas Wright Hale Hussey (born 1836 — Bowdoin ‘63)
1867-1869: George Francis Robinson (born 1843 — Harvard ‘66)
1869: Amos Bancroft Putnam (born 1846 — Amherst ‘69)
1869-1871: Charles Abraham Cole (born 1847 — Bowdoin ‘69)
1871-1874: Joseph Hale Noyes (born 1825 — honorary degree from Bowdoin ‘71)
1874-1875*: Julia Frances Jennings (born 1849/50 — Mount Holyoke ‘70)
1874-1876*: Charlotte E. Cameron (born 1849/50 — Framingham Normal School ‘68)
1876-1879: Charles Everett Washburn (born 1850/51 — Cornell ‘76)
1879-1881: Louis Emil Denfeld (born 1854 — Amherst ‘78)
1881-1886: Frederick Orin Baston (born 1852 — Bowdoin ‘75)
1886-1916: Seldon Lester Brown (born 1856 — Wesleyan ‘79)
1916-1917: Joseph Albert Davis (born 1882 — Bowdoin ‘08)
1917-1919: Carl Bradlee Wetherell Jr. (born 1886 — Harvard ‘08)
1919-1930: George Holley Gilbert Jr. (born 1892 — Dartmouth ‘14)
1930-1941: Ralph Warner Proctor (born 1900 — Tufts ‘21)
*Believed to have been co-principals from 1874-75

Two principals on this list warrant a special mention due to their inept abilities: Hussey — known simply as “yellow-beard” to the students — and Putnam — with “his kid gloves, a tall hat, and his constant threat to punish somebody if he (or she) didn’t obey.” In fact, Putnam nearly derailed the entire high school experiment after his poor teaching and classroom management caused a number of students to drop out never to return.

It’s also worth noting the interesting choice to appoint Julia Jennings and Charlotte Cameron (the only Wellesley natives on this list) as principals. After all, unlike their predecessors, both had been grammar school teachers (in Wellesley) before moving up to the high school level. Their familiarity with the students, however, may have made up for their lack of a strong academic training. But their tenure as principals would only last a few years — when Charles Washburn was named head of the high school in 1876, Cameron returned to teaching at the grammar school and Jennings left to teach in Connecticut (but would later return to serve for over two decades as the first librarian of the Wellesley Free Library.

By 1885, the high school seemed to be well on its way to resembling what we know as Wellesley High School. It wasn’t just that there were now four teachers, each with his or her own special subject. Or that the school now had its own football team, which had already begun its now-infamous rivalry with Needham High School in 1882 (although Wellesley was down 1-3 through the first four Thanksgiving Day games). Rather, it was that the high school had become a dedicated part of the community, a valuable resource that the town’s leaders saw as a way to make Wellesley stand out.

But the situation was still far from perfect. Besides the fact that the high school had to share the Shaw School with the primary and grammar levels, many students in the Wellesley public schools were dropping out long before they reached high school. So there was still very much work left to be done.

The Seldon Brown & Marshall Perrin Era (1886 – 1916):

There are really only two men who deserve almost all of the credit for transforming Wellesley High School into a legitimate institution of secondary education: Seldon Lester Brown and Marshall Livingston Perrin.

Seldon L. Brown & Marshall L. Perrin (Source: Our Town of November 1903 & June 1902)

Seldon L. Brown & Marshall L. Perrin
(Source: Our Town of June 1902 & November 1903)

Seldon “Pa” Brown — as you may have noticed in the list above — served as principal (and teacher of Latin, civics, and, occasionally, mathematics) for thirty years, nearly three times as long as anyone else on that list. He was the original Mr. Wellesley High School and possessed all the characteristics that you’d want in a principal: a strong leader, a scholar, and a firm disciplinarian. He also was a fierce supporter of the school’s athletic teams, was engaged in all forms of town government, and was a longtime Trustee of the Wellesley Free Library. It was through his efforts and civic commitment — as well as his connection to nearly every citizen in town — that helped elevate Wellesley High School to the highest level of importance. By the end of his tenure in 1916, it was no longer viewed simply as a school that catered towards Wellesley’s academic elite.

The success that Brown had, however, wouldn’t have been possible were it not for the efforts of Marshall L. Perrin, the first Superintendent of the Wellesley Public Schools. Before Perrin arrived in 1893, running the entire public school system — everything from developing the curriculum to operating the budgets to hiring and firing the teachers — was left up to the three-member School Committee. I don’t know about you, but I sure as heck wouldn’t trust a bunch of non-educators to decide what’s the best way to teach our youth.

Fortunately, Perrin came in with a superb academic background as well as an unparalleled knowledge of the best pedagogical methods of the time. He had both an undergraduate degree from Harvard — that he got at the tender young age of 18 — and a Ph.D. in the Germanic Languages from the University of Göttingen in Prussia. And it was while overseas that Perrin became familiar with the revolutionary Prussian school system that forms the foundation for education in the United States today.

In addition, Perrin was intimately familiar with Wellesley long before he became Superintendent. He was, after all, born and raised in the town, even attending the very first classes of Wellesley High School in 1865 (as a rather overachieving nine-year-old!). Furthermore, he had briefly served on Wellesley’s first School Committee from 1881-83 before he began his journey abroad.

So it could be argued that no one was more qualified than Perrin to help Wellesley High School excel. Of all the many changes he made, two stand out: i) the implementation of system-wide grading and ii) the removal of the upper grades from the grammar school buildings.

  • The implementation of system-wide grading: Until 1893 — as had been the case since the first district schools opened in the 1790s — students weren’t segregated by grade. All you had were the primary and grammar levels and then the high school (which was graded as just Year 1 through Year 4). The problem with this was two-fold. First, the lack of cohesion between the grammar level and high school made it easier for students to leave after the completion of the grammar school. As silly as it sounds, the first year of high school sounds a lot more important to one’s education if it’s called ‘9th Grade’ rather than ‘Year 1.’ But more importantly, without grades, it was more difficult to hold students to the academic standards that were required for success at the high school. Children were just pushed through primary and grammar school as they aged, independent of their skills and academic abilities. It’s no wonder that many students who came into the high school were woefully unprepared and soon dropped out.
  • The removal of the upper grades from the grammar schools: Once grades one through twelve were established in 1893, the problem remained that the district schools still housed students from all of the lower eight grades. Today, such a grouping would seem insane. No one wants fourteen-year-olds hanging around first-graders. Besides asking for trouble, it surely didn’t help the older students mature, making that jump from grammar school to high school all the more difficult. So Perrin fought for and, in 1907, oversaw the separation of grades six through nine from the grammar schools.

Well, the actual story is a bit more complex than that. Perrin, in fact, formed two groups: an ‘Intermediate’ level with grades six and seven and a ‘Grammar’ level with grades eight and nine. And to make it even more confusing, from 1902 to 1915, there were actually thirteen grades (not including kindergarten) because there was also a different ninth grade at the high school. Of course, many of the advanced students who managed to make it all the way through high school often skipped grades, so it probably wasn’t the case that very many of them attended all thirteen grades.

Normalcy resumed in 1916 when the number of grades went back down to twelve after the ninth grade at the grammar level was incorporated into the eighth grade. And three years later, in 1919, the Junior High School, consisting of grades seven through nine, was formally adopted, sending the sixth grade back to the lower (elementary) schools and taking away the ninth grade from the high school. It wasn’t until 1983 that the ninth grade moved back into the high school when the current Middle School structure was established for grades six through eight.

Given all that confusion, I imagine it’s obvious then that during those years the entire public school system was undergoing a massive change. And since all that was done with the goal of trying to keep kids in school longer, it shouldn’t be surprising then that the high school continuously found itself ridiculously overcrowded.

This was true even after Wellesley High School finally got its very own schoolhouse in 1895.

(First) High School at 324 Washington Street  -- built in 1894 (Source: Our Town of July 1901)

(First) High School at 324 Washington Street — built in 1894 and opened in 1895
(Source: Our Town of July 1901)

So the high school moved twelve years later — in 1907 — to yet another building.

(First) High School at 324 Washington Street  -- built in 1894 (Source: Our Town of July 1901)

(Second) High School on Kingsbury Street — built in 1907 and razed in 1946
(Source: 1907 Wellesley Town Report)

Evolution into the Modern High School (1917-1938):

When Seldon Brown stepped down as principal of Wellesley High School in 1916 — seven years after Perrin retired from the position of Superintendent — the progress that the high school had undergone was truly remarkable. But I still wouldn’t put the school on par with the Wellesley High School of 1938. Although both had strong teachers and good facilities, student retention when Brown left — although vastly better than it had been only a decade or two earlier — was far from perfect.

Just take a look at the following graph that shows how the distribution of student enrollment (relative to the number of first-graders) changed from 1898 to 1938.

EnrollmentGraph_labeled

Distribution of enrollment across grades one through twelve
(Data collected from Wellesley Town Reports)

What should stand out are the steep drops in enrollment during the four earliest periods: 1898, 1908, 1918, and 1928. Students just weren’t making it to high school. Or, if they did make it, many left after one or two years. (Also note the steep drop in 1918 after 9th grade. That was, of course, because of World War I. Starting as early as 1915, students — mostly boys, but many girls as well — dropped out as the labor force grew in response to the conflict in Europe. This trend accelerated after the United States officially entered the war in 1917. After that, even more jobs were left vacant as men went off to battle.)

Now compare enrollment during those earlier years to that in 1938. Just as you see in the 2012 data, there was no drop in enrollment in 1938. (In fact, there was a small hump.)

Besides the implementation of grading and the establishment of the Junior High School, what else can explain this increase in student retention? Here are three more reasons:

  • The increase in wealth during the 1920s and 1930s: Wellesley really didn’t become the town that it is today in terms of its affluence until the beginning of the 1920s with the rise of the automobile. Only twelve miles from Boston, the town became one of the most desirable and wealthiest communities outside of the city. That meant, of course, more funding to invest into the town’s schools. But it also changed the demographics of the town, as a disproportionate number of these newcomers came with high school and college educations. So it was far more likely that the children of these new residents would matriculate through Wellesley High School (and then go on to college).
  • Decreased frequency at which students were held back: Unlike today, when very few students are forced to repeat a grade, the public schools during the first three decades of the 20th Century were holding kids back left and right. Although the intentions of this practice were noble — the teachers and administrators really wanted to make sure that the students picked up enough of the content and skills taught at each grade to succeed at the next level — the unfortunate reality was that it caused students who struggled to drop out long before graduating from high school. (For example, in 1927, there was a fifteen-year-old and three fourteen-year-olds enrolled in the fifth grade. What do you think the odds were that they completed 12th grade?) But starting in the 1930s, specialized attention was given to those students who were thought to be at risk of being held back. It was like a very primitive form of the Special Education programs that exist in all of our schools today.
  • The development of electives, clubs, and athletics: Let’s face it. Not all students care about academics. Unfortunately, the high school for many, many years was only about academics. You went to school, you sat in class, and then you went home. But starting in the 1920s, more attention was given to electives such as woodworking, sewing, and cooking. Maybe if you give students some fun classes in between the boring ones, then they’ll be less likely to drop out. Or give them something to look forward to after school like special interest clubs (e.g., dramatics and the student newspaper) and athletics.

And so, by 1938, this increase in retention — compounded with the explosion in Wellesley’s overall population — resulted in yet another jam-packed high school. It was time to build yet another high school. Well, actually, efforts to construct a new schoolhouse began as early as 1930, but there was this little thing called the Great Depression that the townspeople had to work around. Although Wellesley was relatively insulated from the Depression compared to most other communities, a large group of fiscally conservative citizens — formed mostly in response to the dismal economic conditions at the time — stalled all attempts to appropriate funds to build a new high school. It was only after they agreed to support a plan contingent on the successful application of a Federal subsidy that construction of a new high school finally got the green light.

But then there was the question of where to put the new high school. The old spot on Kingsbury Street just didn’t provide much in the way of playing fields or any room for expansion. So a long battle ensued over two other sites: undeveloped parkland near the Hunnewell playing fields south of Washington Street or off Linden Street at the current location of Upwey Road and Kirkland Circle. Well, to make a long story short, the first site won and the new high school was built, opening its doors to students in the fall of 1938.

(Third) High School on Rice Street -- built in 1938 and razed in 2012 (Source: Contemporary American Architecture: Schools by R.W. Sexton [1939])

(Third) High School on Rice Street — built in 1938 and razed in 2012
(Source: Contemporary American Architecture: Schools by R.W. Sexton [1939])

I don’t think it’s very hard to see how this building was the perfect symbol for the progress made between 1865 and 1938 in regards to the high school. Not so much the architecture — although one could make a decent argument that its soaring tower that was visible all the way from Washington Street represented a beacon that called to our youth. But rather, it was the completion of the building that marked the end of a journey that began with no high school and ended with one of the leading secondary institutions in the Commonwealth, a high school not so different from our current one.

Am I all that surprised that the Town voted in 2008 to raze the 1938 High School rather than go with the renovation plan? Not really. It was the less complicated proposal and was of lower cost to the Town. But this is what we got out of it:

(Fourth) High School at 50 Rice Street -- built in 2012 (Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in August 2013)

(Fourth) High School at 50 Rice Street — built in 2012
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in August 2013)

The best thing that I can say about the new high school is that it’s bright, clean, and provides students with the very latest in modern technology. But it’s sooooo generic and nondescript. It could be located in any town in Massachusetts (or in Kansas, for that matter). There’s nothing about it that says ‘Wellesley.’

And so, in 2050, when the current high school is falling apart and outdated, what are we going to do? Just build another one, of course, because no one is going to be arguing to save it. Maybe then we can right a wrong and just rebuild the 1938 High School on its original location.

Sources:

  • Needham Town Reports: 1865 – 1881
  • Wellesley Town Reports: 1881 – 1938
  • Biographical Record of the Alumni of Amherst College edited by W.L. Montague (1883)
  • Boston Daily Globe: 7 January 1895
  • Biographical Review Containing Life Sketches of Leading Citizens of Norfolk County, Massachusetts (1898)
  • State Normal School, Framingham, Mass.: Catalogue of Teachers and Alumnae, 1839-1900 (1900)
  • Biographical Record of the Alumni and Non-Graduates of Amherst College, 1871-1896 (1901)
  • Our Town: July 1901; June 1902; November 1903
  • Nathaniel T. Allen: Teacher, Reformer, Philanthropist by Mary A. Greene (1906)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 7 September 1906; 15 June 1917; 6 July 1917; 30 May 1919; 20 June 1919; 6 May 1921; 24 May 1929; 11 October 1929; 18 October 1929; 10 January 1930; 28 February 1930; 25 March 1932; 4 May 1934; 14 December 1934; 5 December 1935; 28 February 1936; 19 June 1936; 9 October 1936; 26 August 1938; 10 April 1941; 15 May 1941; 18 February 1943; 14 November 1946; 11 February 1965; 1 September 1983; 20 November 1986
  • Cornell Alumni News: August 1909
  • United States Federal Census: 1910, 1920
  • General Catalogue of Officers & Students by Mount Holyoke College (1911)
  • The Rise of the High School in Massachusetts by Alexander James Inglis (1911)
  • Obituary Record of the Graduates of Bowdoin College and the Medical School of Maine (1911)
  • General Catalogue of Bowdoin College, 1794-1916 (1912)
  • History of Needham, Massachusetts, 1711-1911 by George Kuhn Clarke (1912)
  • The Harvard Graduates’ Magazine: September 1914
  • Obituary Record of the Graduates of Bowdoin College and the Medical School of Maine (1914)
  • Obituary Record of Graduates and Non-Graduates of Amherst College (1919)
  • Secretary’s Third Report, Class of 1908 by Harvard College (1920)
  • Tufts College Bulletin: December 1920
  • Alumni Record of Wesleyan University by Frank W. Nicolson (1921)
  • Early Days in Wellesley by Gamaliel Bradford (1928)
  • Contemporary American Architecture: Schools by R.W. Sexton (1939)
  • Findagrave.com [George Holley Gilbert; accessed in August 2013]
  • House of Proctor [accessed in August 2013; used only for DOB of Ralph Proctor]
  • Old Deluder Satan Law of 1647 from the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries website [accessed in August 2013]

The Wellesley Tea Room (a.k.a. The Wellesley Inn)

Does anyone else find it odd that Wellesley — a town with three colleges, two if you don’t count Mass Bay — is somehow not really a college town? Not in the same way that Amherst and Northampton are college towns. You can live in Wellesley and go days, even weeks, without noticing the two internationally renowned schools that lie within the town’s borders. Um…how is that possible??? Are we so self-absorbed that we can’t see what’s on the other side of our big backyards? (Please don’t answer that.)

In all fairness to us townspeople, it’s not entirely our fault. Babson College, for example, has done a great job of isolating itself on the southern edge of town since it moved from Washington Street in Wellesley Hills to its current campus in the early 1920s. Additionally, it isn’t like these colleges have competitive sports teams that the community can rally around. (Sorry, Wellesley College Blue and Babson College Beavers.)

But maybe we’re at least a little bit responsible for the awkward relationship between Wellesley College and the area around Wellesley Square. Something’s wrong if you can eat a bagel at Bruegger’s or play a round of nine holes at Nehoiden and have no idea that Wellesley College is mere feet from you. It’s also a problem that some Wellesley College students can survive quite happily for at least a month without once stepping outside the campus walls.

See, it wasn’t always like this. For more than 75 years — from the time Wellesley College opened in 1875 until the 1950s — Wellesley Square and Wellesley College were very much joined at the hip. Perhaps the single greatest reason for this was that, for most of this time, much of the student body lived off-campus in large dormitories that lined Washington Street south of Wellesley Square.

WellesleyCollegeDormsCollage_labeled

Four of the Wellesley College dormitories that lined Washington Street
Clockwise from top left: Washington House at 600 Washington Street (from 1941 Legenda); The Elms at 637 Washington Street (from 1935 Legenda); Eliot House at the east corner of Cottage Street & Washington Street — razed in 1953 (from 1907 Legenda); Noanett at the east corner of Weston Road & Washington Street — razed in 1964 (from 1907 Legenda)

Just imagine the roads clogged with students walking or riding their bikes to and from campus. And it wasn’t confined to this stretch of Washington Street. Wellesley College students were all over the Square.

WellesleyCollegeStudentsCollage_labeled

Wellesley College students out and about town
Clockwise from top: Riding on campus just inside the south gate on Washington Street (from 1941 Legenda); Standing in line to buy textbooks at the Hathaway House Bookshop (from 1948 Legenda); Waiting to catch the train at the Wellesley Railroad Station (from 1931 Legenda)

And the center of activity — for at least the first few decades of the 20th Century — was the Wellesley Tea Room (later known as the Wellesley Inn). Its origins actually date to the fall of 1897, when two recent Wellesley College graduates, Mary Esther Chase (‘96) and Clara H. Shaw (‘97), rented a few rooms in a nearby business block and opened a small tea room. The exact location of the Wellesley Tea Room is difficult to pin down — my best guess given the limited records of the Tea Room is the original Partridge Block, which stood on the south side of Central Street directly to the west of the Village Church graveyard.

MaryEChase_Legenda1895

Mary Esther Chase
(Source: 1895 Legenda)

At first, the Tea Room was nothing more than a place where their friends could come to socialize over tea and dessert, as there was no such gathering spot on campus. But it quickly became a sensation with the entire student body. Perhaps it was the freedom that came with hanging out off-campus, away from the house mothers that watched over all the young women with the eyes of hawks.

WellesleyTeaRoom_drawing_BostonDailyGlobe_6Oct1901_edited

Source: Boston Daily Globe – October 6th, 1901

Or maybe it was the food, which was certainly better (and sweeter) than what was being served in the dining halls. Just take a look at this menu:

TheTeaRoom_menu_Legenda1900

Source: 1900 Legenda

As you can probably tell, at this point in time — only three years after opening — the Wellesley Tea Room had become a full-fledged restaurant. And by 1901, it also had six bedrooms for visiting alumnae of the college (and of Dana Hall, whose students embraced the tea room with equal adoration).

This success, no doubt, was a testament to the leadership and business acumen of Mary Chase. (Her co-founder, Clara Shaw, had left for Chicago after one year.) With little to no experience in the hospitality industry, Chase had turned the Tea Room into one of Wellesley’s most popular establishments. This included presiding over a staff of more than a half dozen servants (which included a cook, who was described by the Mansfield Daily Shield as a “typical old-time southern mammy with a gift in the matter of Maryland biscuit” — other national newspapers that wrote about the Wellesley Tea Room and, later, the Wellesley Inn, often included similar racial epithets to describe the staff, almost all of whom appear to have been African-Americans originally from either the South or New York City).

Chase even led the Wellesley Tea Room through its transition into a stock-owned corporation, a move that would generate capital and allow for the necessary expansion of the business. It’s hard not to be impressed by this. After all, the year was 1901. Not exactly a time when women — even college graduates — ran corporations. So it’s no wonder that the 25-year-old Chase received national attention after raising $20,000 (over $500,000 in 2013 dollars) by selling thousands of $5 shares to the public.

In 1902 — after having long outgrown its original quarters — the Wellesley Tea Room used some of this money to purchase a large house on Washington Street opposite the end of Church Street. Up until that time, this dwelling was nothing remarkable — just a simple farmhouse built between 1859 and 1866. Coincidentally, however, the Wellesley Tea Room’s acquisition of the house wasn’t the home’s first connection to Wellesley College. From 1866 until 1868, it was the residence of the parents of Henry F. Durant, the founder of Wellesley College. (Though Durant never lived there — his estate was further along on Washington Street near the current entrance to Wellesley College.)

WellesleyInn_GlimpsesofWellesley_labeled

The second location of the Wellesley Tea Room.
This house would become the core of the Wellesley Inn building.
The dwelling to the right (the Hatch Estate) was later known as the Inn Annex.
Source: Benner (1904)

Before moving into their new quarters, Chase and the rest of her team spent two months renovating its interior and constructing several additions that nearly tripled the square footage. When the new Wellesley Tea Room held its grand opening in September of 1902, the guests saw a building that barely resembled the original farmhouse. And the first floor interior consisted of two separate spaces, each with different entrances from the outside. One half of the building, with its own large reception room and dining room was open to the public for both tea and full meals. But the other half — along with the entire second and third floors — was only accessible to Wellesley College students. In fact, from the time it opened until 1906, the upper floors served as a dormitory for nearly 20 students.

DiningRoom_WellesleyInn_Legenda1905_croppedclose

The student dining room
(Source: 1905 Legenda)

And just as it had been at its original location, the Tea Room was the unofficial clubhouse for all Wellesley College students. I think the New York Tribune described it best:

“Coming back from Boston at the fag-end of an afternoon’s shopping, a group of students find it easier “to gain the timely inn” — as their study of Shakespeare has taught them — than to go on the mile further to the college for refreshment. Again, when a student feels a trifle homesick, or is disheartened over an accumulation of “papers due,” the hospital inn looms up invitingly on her mental horizon and she starts off, sure of diversion and sure of the warmest welcome.” 

And what food awaited her? How about…

“…[g]rapefruit with maraschino cherries, bouillon with whipped cream, broiled chicken on toast, French fried potatoes, asparagus tips, French peas, cranberry ice, fruit salad, café mousse, fudge cake and coffee. If they are having some Harvard men out to dine, and want a hearty meal, the menu would be more likely to run after this wise: Mock turtle soup, sirloin steak with mushrooms, French fried potatoes, celery, scalloped tomatoes, apple fritters, cheese and pepper salad, apple pie with ice cream and coffee.”

Talk about clogged arteries!

And what post on the Wellesley Tea Room would be complete without an expanded discussion on the aforementioned “fudge cake.” After all, this was the famous Wellesley Fudge Cake –  a rich chocolate cake with fudge-like chocolate frosting. Its popularity even inspired a rival fudge cake in a rival tea room in Wellesley Square. And then it went national, with recipes for the Wellesley Fudge Cake appearing in newspapers and magazines all over the country. Here’s one such example from a 1941 issue of Life Magazine:

 And for those amateur pâtissiers out there, here’s a close-up of the recipe: 

WellesleyFudgeCake_LifeMagazine_Oct6_1941_croppedrecipeMary Chase would end up stepping away from the Wellesley Tea Room following her engagement in the summer of 1903. (It’s comforting to know that instead of staying at home, she ran a bungalow resort in the Poconos of Pennsylvania.) The Tea Room, however, would not suffer one bit in her absence — newly minted graduates of Wellesley College filled her void and ran the business with equal success.

But the Wellesley Tea Room wouldn’t last forever. In 1914 — six years after formally changing its name to the Wellesley Inn — its Board of Directors sold the Inn to the Bransfield family, who would own and operate it for the next 46 years. Among the many changes the Bransfields made to the Inn were the addition of the portico over the main entrance as well as the acquisition of the adjacent house (as seen in the old photograph above) which occasionally had been leased for additional space beginning in 1903. This dwelling — known as the Inn Annex — was razed in 1964 to make room for the new Inn Annex seen below.

WellesleyInn_flickr_entropy1024_enlarged_labeled

The Wellesley Inn in 1999
(Posted with permission from Entropy1024)

It’s hard to pinpoint the exact year that the Inn transitioned from a college hangout to the place that we all remember. Even after the Bransfield family took over, the Inn remained a hotspot for Wellesley College students and their friends and family. But whatever clubhouse atmosphere remained probably dissipated following the 1952 construction of Bates and Freeman Halls and the ensuing closure of the dorms along Washington Street. Wellesley College students were now far less likely to stray into Wellesley Square.

The rest of this story is pretty straightforward. After decades as one of the premiere lodging and food establishments in Wellesley, the Inn had lost its luster by the 1990s and early 2000s. And so, in 2005, the Wellesley Inn shut its doors after 108 years in operation. It was razed the following year.

WellesleyInn_holeinground_bingmaps

The former site of the Wellesley Inn
(Source: Bing Maps)

After seven long years, the hole in the ground where the Inn once stood is finally about to be filled. Just like everyone else, I’m anxious to see this project completed. But there’s a completely irrational and unrealistic part of me that wishes the developer would rebuild the Wellesley Tea Room circa 1902. Or at least something that would help break down the barriers between Wellesley College and the rest of the town. The status quo just isn’t ideal — not for the merchants of Wellesley Square, the students, or even the rest of us Wellesley folks. Yeah, maybe this separation allows for an enhanced college experience, but students can bring vibrancy to a community like no one else can.

Is anyone with me on this?

Sources:

  • Norfolk County Registry of Deeds
  • The Wellesley Legenda: 189519001905190719201931193519411948
  • Atlas of Wellesley by George W. Stadley & Co. (1897)
  • 1900 U.S. Federal Census
  • The Wellesley Magazine: June 1900
  • Boston Daily Globe: 6 October 1901; 22 September 1902
  • Mansfield Daily Shield: 19 October 1901
  • Boston Evening Transcript: 20 September 1902; 24 December 1908
  • New York Tribune: 12 October 1902; 17 January 1909
  • The Wellesley News: 29 October 1902; 13 April 1904; 28 March 1906; 25 April 1906; 30 November 1911
  • Our Town: November 1902; August 1903
  • ‘A College Inn’ by Jeannette A. Marks in June 1903 issue of Good Housekeeping
  • ‘New Occupations for Educated Women’ by Mary Caroline Crawford in June 27, 1903 issue of New Outlook
  • Glimpses of Wellesley by E.H. Benner (1904)
  • Wellesley College Record, 1875-1912: A General Catalogue of Students (1912)
  • Wellesley Townsman: 15 March 1918; 16 October 1952; 19 March 1953; 26 December 1963; 12 March 1964; 24 September 1964; 10 December 1981; 16 April 2009
  • Life Magazine: 6 October 1941
  • Wellesley College, 1875-1975: A Century of Women edited by Jean Glasscock (1975)

College Hall (Wellesley College)

The subject of this post — College Hall at Wellesley College — is difficult for me to write about. In fact, every time I think about the building, my mind goes blank and I’m left speechless. Take a look at the following image of College Hall and you’ll see what I’m talking about.

CollegeHall_bySeaver_cropped_watermark

College Hall
(Photo taken by Seaver and accessed from the Wellesley College Digital Archives)

See? How do you find the words to describe that? And what’s equally remarkable is that many of you have probably never even heard of College Hall. How does a building that big and grandiose — even if it burned down nearly a century ago — evade anyone’s recognition?

In telling the story of College Hall, I need to begin by delving into the origins of Wellesley College. After all, College Hall was Wellesley College for 39 years. So let’s go all the way back to 1855 — two decades before the school opened its doors — when Henry Fowle Durant, a highly successful lawyer from Boston, bought a summer residence in Wellesley following his marriage to Pauline Adeline Fowle. It’s unknown exactly why they chose to move to the small farming community of Wellesley (known as West Needham at the time), but it may have had to do with the fact that they were both related to Horatio Hollis Hunnewell and his wife, Isabella Pratt Welles, who had already begun building their sprawling estate in the southwest corner of town. (Henry and Pauline Durant — first cousins themselves — were first cousins once removed with Horatio Hunnewell as he was their great-aunt’s son. And Isabella Welles was their aunt’s husband’s niece…whatever that’s called.)

The Durants’ summer cottage was located on Washington Street down the road from the Hunnewell Estate (at the current entrance to Wellesley College across from the Nehoiden golf course). This house, which still stands at its original location, was at the southern edge of their 300-acre estate that bordered Lake Waban. Originally, Durant wanted to build a much more elegant home just as the Hunnewell family had done, but those plans were halted after the death of his eight-year-old son, Harry, in 1863. (His only other child, Pauline, had died six years earlier.)

It was at this time that Henry Durant began a journey that would culminate in the establishment of Wellesley College. The initial step was taken when Durant — who had embraced Evangelicalism in the wake of Harry’s death — stepped away from his legal practice after determining that the law and Christianity were irreconcilable. He then started to question how he could use his large estate and vast wealth to do God’s work. After considering a number of options — including building an orphan asylum and establishing a private school for boys — he settled on creating an institution for the education of young women. This was certainly a pressing need as there were only a few female colleges and seminaries throughout the entire United States. (Durant chose to name the school, ‘Wellesley Female Seminary,’ after the Hunnewell estate, ‘Wellesley.’ The school changed its name to ‘Wellesley College’ before it opened in 1875.)

The inspiration to build College Hall most likely came from studying two of the most well-known and highly regarded women’s colleges at the time: Mount Holyoke Seminary and Vassar College, where each of their campuses was dominated by one large building containing nearly all of the classrooms, dormitories, and administrative offices.

The construction of College Hall commenced in 1871 and would last four years. And when the first students arrived in the fall of 1875 — even as the finishing touches on the building were still being completed — they saw one of the largest and most impressive structures built up to that point in time. Sitting high on a hill overlooking Lake Waban, College Hall resembled an abbey or monastery more than a school. Given Durant’s religious devotion, this resemblance wasn’t unintentional. In fact, its floorplan was even in the shape of a papal cross — a 480-foot-long main axis intersected by three shorter wings. And spires capped with crosses decorated the roof.

CollegeHall2_bySeaver_cropped

College Hall overlooking Lake Waban
(Photo taken by Seaver and accessed from the Wellesley College Digital Archives)

In addition to classrooms, dormitories, and administrative offices, College Hall also housed the library, chapel, dining hall, gymnasium, and even a large art gallery. And at its center was a five-story glass-roofed atrium (appropriately known as ‘Center’) that overlooked a marble basin filled with palms and other exotic flora.

Below are several images showing just some of the vast interior of College Hall. (All photographs in this article, unless otherwise noted, are posted with permission from the Wellesley College Digital Archives, a fantastic resource that I strongly encourage everyone to visit.)

CollegeHall_cropped

The five-story atrium (known as ‘Center’)

Center_CollegeHall_bySeaver_cropped

The base of the atrium with its marble basin filled with palms and exotic flora
(Photo taken by Seaver)

Library_CollegeHall_cropped

The main library

PhysicsLaboratory_CollegeHall_cropped

A physics laboratory

Chapel_CollegeHall_byThomasLewis_cropped

The chapel
(Photo taken by Thomas Lewis)

Gymnasium_CollegeHall1893_cropped

The gymnasium (in 1893)

ArtGalleryB_CollegeHall_cropped

The art gallery on the fifth floor

CollegeHall_dorm_1877-78_cropped

Students in their dorm room (in 1877-78)

I can barely grasp the intensity of the fire that destroyed College Hall on March 17, 1914. In only four hours, almost the entire building was reduced to rubble. (The only part that survived the inferno was a small two-story wing on the west end of the building that housed the kitchen. It was separated from the rest of College Hall by a fire-door, which was installed to prevent fires from spreading beyond the kitchen. How ironic.) Although the cause of the fire was never determined, it has been hypothesized that faulty electrical wiring or the spontaneous combustion of chemicals was to blame.

And it’s amazing that nobody was killed or injured, especially given the fact that the fire started around four-thirty in the morning as hundreds of students and staff members were asleep in College Hall. Their survival can be credited almost entirely to a frequently rehearsed evacuation plan that broke them up into small squadrons, each led by a student who was required to make sure that all the others in her group were accounted for. And so, from the moment two students on the fourth floor discovered the fire after awaking to the sounds of crackling until ten minutes later when everyone safely exited the building after gathering at Center, all was relatively calm. The students — clad in their robes and slippers — were even able to save many books, paintings, busts, and furniture from the lower floor, passing them down the hill and into the basement of the library.

CollegeHallFire_1914_cropped

College Hall on fire — March 17, 1914

CollegeHallFire_byNLStebbinsPhoto_cropped

The ruins of College Hall
(Photo taken by N.L. Stebbins)

Given the destruction caused by the fire, it’s remarkable that the college was able to finish out the school year — albeit with a three-week break. Hours after the fire, as the ruins of College Hall lay smoldering, the school closed and the students were sent home, nearly 500 of them taking the 6:04 Boston Express to Grand Central Station in New York City. When they returned three weeks later, a temporary wooden building (known as the ‘Hen-Coop’ because of its appearance) had been constructed at the base of the hill which College Hall had sat upon. Although the Hen-Coop provided space for classes and administrative offices, finding rooms for the students to live in was a more difficult matter. Fortunately, many girls who lived in the other dormitories were more than willing to share their rooms with their displaced classmates.

And almost immediately, the institution began an ambitious fundraising campaign in order to rebuild its campus. In total, it raised over two million dollars ($750,000 of which came from a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation). By the fall of 1915, only a year and a half after the fire, the first new building — Tower Court — had been built on the site of College Hall. Others would soon follow, spread all throughout the campus in large part to minimize the possibility of another thoroughly devastating fire.

SketchofTowerCourt_NewEnglandMagazine_October1914

Architectural sketch of Tower Court
(Source: New England Magazine of October 1914)

Today, five pillars are all that remain of College Hall. Lining the edge of a stone landing at the base of the stairs that lead down from Tower Court, these columns are mere feet from their original location. There’s even a plaque given by the Class of 1917, “the last class to know the original Wellesley College.”

I recently visited this memorial and I have to confess that — just as the photographs of College Hall leave me speechless — I can’t quite put into words how standing next to these pillars made me feel. On one hand, the simplicity of the memorial forces you to appreciate the rich architectural details on the pillars. But there’s also an element of eerieness — you’re confronted with the reality of College Hall even though it feels mythical at times. But more than anything, it makes me sad — as any memorial should — because College Hall no longer stands, having met its demise that March morning nearly one hundred years ago.

PillarsCollegeHall

Pillars from College Hall
(Photo taken by Joshua Dorin in May 2013)

Sources:

  • Wellesley College Digital Archives
  • Wellesley Historical Commission files: Durant Cottage Homestead; 845 Washington Street
  • Reminiscences of the Family of Captain John Fowle of Watertown, Massachusetts (1891)
  • New York Times: 18 March 1914; 9 April 1914
  • Wellesley Townsman: 19 June 1914
  • Wellesley College, 1875-1975: A Century of Women edited by Jean Glasscock (1975)

Addendum:

Below is a map showing the Wellesley College campus in 1897. Additionally, I’ve included a satellite photo of the current campus.

1897Atlas_collegehall

Map of the Wellesley College campus in 1897
(Source: 1897 Atlas of Wellesley)

bingmaps_CollegeHallsite

Satellite view of the Wellesley College campus
(Source: Bing Maps)